...
首页> 外文期刊>Blood: The Journal of the American Society of Hematology >Superiority of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTD) as induction pretransplantation therapy in multiple myeloma: A randomized phase 3 PETHEMA/GEM study
【24h】

Superiority of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTD) as induction pretransplantation therapy in multiple myeloma: A randomized phase 3 PETHEMA/GEM study

机译:硼替佐米,沙利度胺和地塞米松(VTD)在多发性骨髓瘤中作为诱导移植前治疗的优势:一项3期PETHEMA / GEM随机研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Spanish Myeloma Group conducted a trial to compare bortezomib/ thalidomide/dexamethasone (VTD) versus thalidomide/dexamethasone (TD) versus vincristine, BCNU, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, prednisone/vincristine, BCNU, doxorubicin, dexamethasone/bortezomib (VBMCP/VBAD/B) in patients aged 65 years or younger with multiple myeloma. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate postinduction and post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Three hundred eighty-six patients were allocated to VTD (130), TD (127), or VBMCP/VBAD/B (129). The CR rate was significantly higher with VTD than with TD (35% vs 14%, P = .001) or with VBMCP/VBAD/B (35% vs 21%, P = .01). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer with VTD (56.2 vs 28.2 vs 35.5 months, P = .01). In an intention-to-treat analysis, the post-ASCT CR rate was higher with VTD than with TD (46% vs 24%, P = .004) or with VBMCP/VBAD/B (46% vs 38%, P = .1). Patients with high-risk cytogenetics had a shorter PFS and overall survival in the overall series and in all treatment groups. In conclusion, VTD resulted in a higher preand posttransplantation CR rate and in a significantly longer PFS although it was not able to overcome the poor prognosis of high-risk cytogenetics. Our results support the use of VTD as a highly effective induction regimen prior to ASCT. The study was registered with http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00461747) and Eudra CT (no. 2005-001110-41).
机译:西班牙骨髓瘤小组进行了一项试验,比较了硼替佐米/沙利度胺/地塞米松(VTD)与沙利度胺/地塞米松(TD)与长春新碱,BCNU,美法仑,环磷酰胺,泼尼松/长春新碱,BCNU,阿霉素,地塞米松V / BMetBV ),年龄在65岁以下的多发性骨髓瘤患者中。主要终点是诱导后和自体干细胞移植后的完全缓解率。 386例患者被分配到VTD(130),TD(127)或VBMCP / VBAD / B(129)。 VTD的CR率显着高于TD(35%vs 14%,P = .001)或VBMCP / VBAD / B(35%vs 21%,P = 0.01)。 VTD的中位无进展生存期(PFS)明显更长(56.2 vs 28.2 vs 35.5个月,P = 0.01)。在意向治疗分析中,VTD的ASCT后CR率高于TD(46%vs 24%,P = .004)或VBMCP / VBAD / B(46%vs 38%,P = .1)。在整个系列和所有治疗组中,高危细胞遗传学患者的PFS和总体生存期较短。总之,尽管VTD不能克服高危细胞遗传学的不良预后,但它导致更高的移植前后CR率和更长的PFS。我们的研究结果支持VTD作为ASCT之前的高效诱导方案。该研究已在http://www.clinicaltrials.gov(NCT00461747)和Eudra CT(第2005-001110-41号)中注册。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号