首页> 外文期刊>Antiviral therapy >Amprenavir and lopinavir pharmacokinetics following coadministration of amprenavir or fosamprenavir with lopinavir/ritonavir, with or without efavirenz.
【24h】

Amprenavir and lopinavir pharmacokinetics following coadministration of amprenavir or fosamprenavir with lopinavir/ritonavir, with or without efavirenz.

机译:在将安普那韦或fosamprenavir与lopinavir / ritonavir并用或不并用efavirenz后,氨普那韦和洛匹那韦的药代动力学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Amprenavir (APV), fosamprenavir (FPV), lopinavir (LPV), ritonavir (RTV) and efavirenz (EFV) are to varying degrees substrates, inducers and inhibitors of CYP3A4. Coadministration of these drugs might result in complex pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. METHODS: Two prospective, open-label, non-randomized studies evaluated APV and LPV steady-state pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected patients on APV 750 mg twice daily + LPV/RTV 533/133 mg twice daily with EFV (n=7) or without EFV (n=12) + background nucleosides (Study 1) and after switching FPV 1,400 mg twice daily for APV (n=10) (Study 2). RESULTS: In Study 1 EFV and non-EFV groups did not differ in APV minimum plasma concentration (Cmin; 1.10 versus 1.06 microg/ml, P = 0.89), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC; 17.46 versus 24.34 microg x h/ml, P = 0.22) or maximum concentration (Cmax; 2.61 versus 4.33 microg/ml, P = 0.08); for LPV there was no difference in Cmin, (median: 3.66 versus 6.18 microg/ml, P = 0.20), AUC (81.84 versus93.75 microg x h/ml, P = 0.37) or Cmax (10.36 versus 10.93 microg/ml, P = 0.61). In Study 2, after switching from APV to FPV, APV Cmin increased by 58% (0.83 versus 1.30 microg/ml, P = 0.0001), AUC by 76% (19.41 versus 34.24 micorg x h/ml, P = 0.0001), and Cmax by 75% (3.50 versus 6.14, P = 0.001). Compared with historical controls, LPV and RTV pharmacokinetics were not changed. All treatment regimens were well tolerated. Seven of eight completers (88%) maintained HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/ml 12 weeks after the switch (1 lost to follow up). CONCLUSIONS: EFV did not appear to significantly alter APV and LPV pharmacokinetic parameters in HIV-infected patients taking APV 750 mg twice daily + LPV 533/133 mg twice daily. Switching FPV 1400 mg twice daily for APV 750 mg twice daily resulted in an increase in APV Cmin, AUC, and Cmax without changing LPV or RTV pharmacokinetics or overall tolerability.
机译:背景:氨普那韦(APV),磷氨普钠(FPV),洛匹那韦(LPV),利托那韦(RTV)和依非韦伦(EFV)在不同程度上是CYP3A4的底物,诱导剂和抑制剂。这些药物的共同给药可能导致复杂的药代动力学药物-药物相互作用。方法:两项前瞻性,开放性,非随机性研究评估了750毫克的APV每天两次,每天两次的LPV / RTV 533/133毫克的EFV(n = 7)或每天两次的HIV感染患者的APV和LPV稳态药代动力学。不含EFV(n = 12)+背景核苷(研究1),并且将FPV每天两次更换1,400 mg APV(n = 10)(研究2)。结果:在研究1中,EFV和非EFV组的APV最低血浆浓度(Cmin; 1.10对1.06 microg / ml,P = 0.89),浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC; 17.46对24.34 microg xh /)没有差异。 ml,P = 0.22)或最大浓度(Cmax; 2.61对4.33 microg / ml,P = 0.08);对于LPV,Cmin(中位数:3.66对6.18微克/毫升,P = 0.20),AUC(81.84对93.75微克xh / ml,P = 0.37)或Cmax(10.36对10.93 microg / ml,P = 0.61)。在研究2中,从APV切换为FPV后,APV Cmin增加了58%(0.83对1.30 microg / ml,P = 0.0001),AUC增加了76%(19.41对34.24 micorg xh / ml,P = 0.0001),Cmax降低了75%(3.50对6.14,P = 0.001)。与历史对照相比,LPV和RTV的药代动力学没有改变。所有治疗方案均耐受良好。转换完成后12周,八分之七的完成者(88%)维持HIV-1 RNA <400拷贝/ ml(失去了一个随访)。结论:EFV似乎并未显着改变接受APV 750 mg每天两次+ LPV 533/133 mg每天两次的HIV感染患者的APV和LPV药代动力学参数。每天两次将FPV 1400 mg换为APV 750 mg两次,导致APV Cmin,AUC和Cmax增加,而LPV或RTV药代动力学或总体耐受性不变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号