首页> 外文期刊>Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice >The Objective Borderline method (OBM): A probability-based model for setting up an objective pass/fail cut-off score in medical programme assessments
【24h】

The Objective Borderline method (OBM): A probability-based model for setting up an objective pass/fail cut-off score in medical programme assessments

机译:客观边界法(OBM):一种基于概率的模型,用于在医疗计划评估中建立客观通过/未通过分数

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The decision to pass or fail a medical student is a 'high stakes' one. The aim of this study is to introduce and demonstrate the feasibility and practicality of a new objective standard-setting method for determining the pass/fail cut-off score from borderline grades. Three methods for setting up pass/fail cut-off scores were compared: the Regression Method, the Borderline Group Method, and the new Objective Borderline Method (OBM). Using Year 5 students' OSCE results from one medical school we established the pass/fail cut-off scores by the abovementioned three methods. The comparison indicated that the pass/fail cut-off scores generated by the OBM were similar to those generated by the more established methods (0. 840 ≤ r ≤ 0. 998; p <. 0001). Based on theoretical and empirical analysis, we suggest that the OBM has advantages over existing methods in that it combines objectivity, realism, robust empirical basis and, no less importantly, is simple to use.
机译:通过或失败医学生的决定是“高风险”的决定。这项研究的目的是介绍和证明一种新的客观标准制定方法的可行性和实用性,该方法可以确定临界等级的合格/不合格分值。比较了设置合格/不合格截止分数的三种方法:回归方法,边界线组方法和新的客观边界线方法(OBM)。使用来自一所医学院的5年级学生的OSCE成绩,我们通过上述三种方法建立了合格/不合格截止分数。比较结果表明,OBM生成的通过/未通过得分与通过更成熟的方法生成的得分相似(0. 840≤r≤0.998; p <。0001)。基于理论和经验分析,我们认为OBM与现有方法相比具有优势,因为它结合了客观性,现实性,强大的经验基础,并且同样重要的是,它易于使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号