首页> 外文期刊>Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice >Internal structure of mini-CEX scores for internal medicine residents: factor analysis and generalizability.
【24h】

Internal structure of mini-CEX scores for internal medicine residents: factor analysis and generalizability.

机译:内科住院医师mini-CEX评分的内部结构:因子分析和推广性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The mini-CEX is widely used to rate directly observed resident-patient encounters. Although several studies have explored the reliability of mini-CEX scores, the dimensionality of mini-CEX scores is incompletely understood. OBJECTIVE: explore the dimensionality of mini-CEX scores through factor analysis and generalizability analysis. DESIGN: factor analytic and generalizability study using retrospective data. PARTICIPANTS: eighty five physician preceptors and 264 internal medicine residents (postgraduate years 1-3). METHODS: preceptors used the six-item mini-CEX to rate directly observed resident-patient encounters in internal medicine resident continuity clinics. We analyzed mini-CEX scores accrued over 4 years using repeated measures analysis of variance to generate a correlation matrix adjusted for multiple observations on individual residents, and then performed factor analysis on this adjusted correlation matrix. We also performed generalizability analyses. RESULTS: eighty-five preceptors rated 264 residents in 1,414 resident-patient encounters. Common factor analysis of these scores after adjustment for repeated measures revealed a single-factor solution. Cronbach's alpha for this single factor (i.e. all six mini-CEX items) was >/= 0.86. Sensitivity analyses using principal components and other method variations revealed a similar factor structure. Generalizability studies revealed a reproducibility coefficient of 0.23 (0.70 for 10 raters or encounters). CONCLUSIONS: the mini-CEX appears to measure a single global dimension of clinical competence. If educators desire to measure discrete clinical skills, alternative assessment methods may be required. Our approach to factor analysis overcomes the limitation of repeated observations on subjects without discarding data, and may be useful to other researchers attempting factor analysis of datasets in which individuals contribute multiple observations.
机译:mini-CEX被广泛用于评估直接观察到的住院病人的遭遇。尽管有几项研究探讨了mini-CEX分数的可靠性,但对mini-CEX分数的维度尚不完全了解。目的:通过因素分析和归纳分析探索mini-CEX评分的维度。设计:使用回顾性数据进行因子分析和归纳研究。参与者:八十五名医师和264名内科医师(研究生1-3年级)。方法:感受器使用六项迷你CEX来对直接在内科住院连续性诊所中观察到的住院病人的情况进行评分。我们使用方差的重复测量分析来分析4年内产生的mini-CEX分数,以生成针对各个居民的多次观察而调整的相关矩阵,然后对该调整后的相关矩阵进行因子分析。我们还进行了概括性分析。结果:在1414例住院病人中,有八十五种感受器对264名居民进行了评估。在针对重复测量进行调整后,对这些分数进行的公共因子分析揭示了单因子解决方案。单个因素(即所有六个小型CEX项目)的Cronbach alpha≥0.86。使用主成分和其他方法变化进行的敏感性分析显示了相似的因子结构。普遍性研究显示可重复性系数为0.23(10个评估者或相遇者为0.70)。结论:mini-CEX似乎可以衡量临床能力的单个整体维度。如果教育者希望衡量离散的临床技能,则可能需要其他评估方法。我们的因子分析方法克服了在不丢弃数据的情况下对受试者重复观察的局限性,对于其他尝试对个体贡献多个观察值的数据集进行因子分析的研究人员可能很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号