首页> 外文期刊>Information Outlook >Don't Touch that String! There Went the Databases
【24h】

Don't Touch that String! There Went the Databases

机译:不要触摸该字符串! 数据库去了

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Web discovery tools can change not only the way users search and retrieve information, but also, how libraries and librarians work with information. When the University of North Florida implemented web scale discovery tools, we discovered that the technical implementation was challenging, but the most difficult changes were related to the library culture. Our students were "early adopters" moving from over 26 different entry points to finding most library materials in one search. But our staff and faculty were more resistant to the change. Technical challenges related to implementation included coordinating the various technology pieces to customize the search interface, convert link resolvers, and to maintain interaction with the proxy server. Because of the complicated nature of web-scale discovery, we learned that no matter how much you prepare for implementation, there will be new and unexpected issues to resolve. Solutions for these problems require input from external entities and not just the library. Cultural challenges involved library faculty and staff that had the perception that the discovery tool did not produce comparable results to a search done directly in a specific database. When we analyzed this issue, we found that not only didthe discovery tool return more accurate results, but also more relevant results. In addition, the results were from databases faculty and staff would not have normally thought to use. The issue then demonstrated the need for more training for library faculty and staff to learn how to refine searches in the discovery tool to achieve maximum results. By implementing web scale, we essentially untied the string that contained our expectations and experience regarding how search engines work and how users interact with them—and this unraveled all our previously held assumptions about how the library provides research service. The University of North Florida Library's internet presence consisted of access points to over 300 databases which were available to users only by subject grouping and alphabetized lists. The Library realized that we were limiting access to content by forcing users to choose a database before starting a search. Therefore, relevant content in databases that the user might not think to search was excluded. Additionally, it was difficult to becomingly increasingly difficult to maintain the subject access approach using a list. In the past, UNF Library had dabbled unsuccessfully with federated search services. We chose to look for a technical solution that could unite our databases, make access to content easy, and make searching less cumbersome for our users. So we chose to look at new web scale discovery tools to answer our needs. We looked at emerging library discovery tools such as EDS by EBSCO, Summon by Serials Solutions, and Primo Central by Ex Libris.
机译:Web Discovery工具不仅可以更改用户搜索和检索信息的方式,还可以更改图书馆和图书馆员如何使用信息。当北佛罗里达大学实施网络规模发现工具时,我们发现技术实施具有挑战性,但最困难的变化与图书馆文化有关。我们的学生是从26个不同的入口点转移到一次搜索中查找大多数图书馆材料的“早期收养者”。但是我们的员工和教职员工对变革更具抵抗力。与实施相关的技术挑战包括协调各种技术来自定义搜索界面,转换链接解析器并保持与代理服务器的交互。由于网络规模发现的复杂性质,我们了解到,无论您准备多少实施,都会有新的和意外的问题要解决。这些问题的解决方案需要外部实体的输入,而不仅仅是库。文化挑战涉及图书馆的教职员工,他们认为发现工具与直接在特定数据库中进行的搜索没有可比的结果。当我们分析此问题时,我们发现发现工具不仅返回了更准确的结果,而且还返回了更相关的结果。此外,结果是来自数据库的教职员工,通常不认为工作人员使用。然后,该问题表明需要对图书馆教职员工进行更多培训,以学习如何在发现工具中完善搜索以获得最大的结果。通过实施Web量表,我们基本上取消了包含有关搜索引擎如何工作以及用户如何与他们进行交互的期望和经验的字符串,这揭示了我们先前对图书馆如何提供研究服务的所有假设。北佛罗里达大学图书馆的互联网存在包括300多个数据库的访问点,这些数据库仅通过主题分组和字母表列表可供用户使用。图书馆意识到,我们通过强迫用户在开始搜索之前选择数据库来限制对内容的访问。因此,用户可能不会认为搜索的数据库中的相关内容被排除在外。此外,很难使用列表来维护主题访问方法变得越来越困难。过去,UNF图书馆对联合搜索服务涉足失败。我们选择寻找一种可以团结我们数据库,使内容访问的技术解决方案,并使对用户的搜索减少。因此,我们选择查看新的Web量表发现工具来满足我们的需求。我们研究了新兴的库发现工具,例如EBSCO的EDS,Serials Solutions召唤,以及Ex Libris的Primo Central。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号