首页> 外文期刊>Blood Pressure Monitoring >Assessment of blood pressure control in hypertensive stroke survivors: an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring study.
【24h】

Assessment of blood pressure control in hypertensive stroke survivors: an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring study.

机译:高血压中风幸存者的血压控制评估:一项动态血压监测研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: We compared the sensitivity of office blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring recordings in evaluating the effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment and identified factors related to inadequate blood pressure control among hypertensive stroke survivors. METHODS: Office blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measurements were performed at 120+/-30 days after ictus in 187 first-ever consecutive hypertensive stroke survivors who were receiving blood pressure-lowering medications according to international guidelines. Handicap was assessed by the modified Rankin Scale. Blood pressure was regarded as controlled if office and daytime ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure values were <140/90 and <135/85 mmHg, respectively. Patients were subclassified according to the degree of their nocturnal systolic blood pressure fall [(mean daytime values-mean night-time values)100/mean daytime values] as dippers (>or=10%), nondippers (>or=0% and <10%) and reverse dippers (<0%). RESULTS: Effective blood pressure control was documented in significantly (P<0.001) fewer patients using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (32.1%) than those using office recordings (43.3%), whereas in 16% of the study population a masked lack of per-treatment blood pressure control (elevated ambulatory blood pressure in the presence of normal office blood pressure levels) was identified. The distribution of dipping patterns differed significantly (P=0.01) between controlled hypertensive individuals (normal office and ambulatory measurements) and patients with isolated ambulatory hypertension (dippers: 31.3 vs. 10.0%; nondippers:56.9 vs. 53.3%; reverse dippers: 11.8 vs. 36.7%). Logistic regression analysis revealed diabetes mellitus and functional independency (modified Rankin Scale score<2) as independent predictors of inadequate blood pressure control. CONCLUSION: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring detects a substantial number of treated hypertensive stroke survivors with a masked lack of per-treatment blood pressure control, who present a higher prevalence of abnormal circadian blood pressure patterns (reverse dipping). Diabetes mellitus and poststroke functional independency are the main factors contributing to inadequate blood pressure control.
机译:背景:我们比较了办公室血压和动态血压监测记录在评估降压治疗效果方面的敏感性,并确定了与高血压中风幸存者血压控制不足相关的因素。方法:在发作后的120 +/- 30天,对187名根据国际指南接受降压药物治疗的首例连续性高血压中风幸存者进行办公室血压和动态血压监测。残障由改良的兰金量表评估。如果办公室和白天的非卧床收缩压和舒张压分别小于140/90和135/85 mmHg,则认为血压是可控的。根据患者夜间收缩压下降的程度[(白天平均值-夜间平均值)100 /白天平均值]将患者分类为北斗星(> or = 10%),非北斗星(> or = 0%和<10%)和反向浸入器(<0%)。结果:有效血压控制的记录表明,使用动态血压监测的患者(32.1%)明显少于(P <0.001)使用办公室记录的患者(43.3%),而在研究人群中,有16%的受访者掩盖了缺乏确定了治疗的血压控制(在正常办公室血压水平存在的情况下门诊血压升高)。在控制性高血压患者(正常办公室和门诊测量)与孤立性门诊高血压患者之间,浸渍模式的分布差异显着(P = 0.01)(北斗星:31.3比10.0%;非北斗星:56.9比53.3%;反向北斗星:11.8比36.7%)。 Logistic回归分析显示,糖尿病和功能独立性(改良的Rankin Scale评分<2)是血压控制不充分的独立预测因子。结论:动态血压监测发现大量治疗过的高血压中风幸存者,掩盖了缺乏每次治疗的血压控制,这些人的昼夜节律性血压模式(反向浸入)的患病率更高。糖尿病和中风后功能独立性是导致血压控制不足的主要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号