...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Sports Medicine >Individualized anterior cruciate ligament surgery: A prospective study comparing anatomic single- and double-bundle reconstruction
【24h】

Individualized anterior cruciate ligament surgery: A prospective study comparing anatomic single- and double-bundle reconstruction

机译:个性化前交叉韧带手术:前瞻性研究比较解剖学上的单束和双束重建

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has become a commonly performed procedure. However, biomechanical studies have demonstrated that conventional single-bundle ACL reconstruction techniques are only successful in limiting anterior tibial translation but less effective for restoring rotatory laxity. Purpose: This study aimed to compare the results of single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction using an anatomic technique, individualized based on the patients native ACL size. The authors hypothesized that there would be no difference between the results of anatomic single-bundle (ASB) and anatomic double-bundle (ADB) reconstruction when the surgical technique is individualized. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Depending on intraoperative measurements of the ACL insertion site size, patients were selected for either ASB (n = 32) or ADB (n = 69) ACL reconstruction. In all groups, hamstring tendons autograft was used with suspensory fixation on the femoral side and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation on the tibial side. The outcomes were evaluated by an independent blinded observer using the Lysholm score, subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, KT-1000 arthrometer for anteroposterior stability, and pivot-shift test for rotational stability. The average follow-up was 30 months (range, 26-34 months). There were no statistically significant differences in the baseline demographics of the 2 groups. Results: There was no significant difference between the ADB and ASB groups for Lysholm score (93.9 vs 93.5), subjective IKDC score (93.3 vs 93.1), anterior tibial translation (1.5- vs 1.6-mm side-to-side difference), and pivot shift (92% vs 90% with negative pivot-shift examination). Conclusion: Anatomic double-bundle reconstruction is not superior to anatomic single-bundle reconstruction when an individualized ACL reconstruction technique is used.
机译:背景:前交叉韧带(ACL)的重建已成为常见的手术方法。然而,生物力学研究表明,常规的单束ACL重建技术仅在限制胫骨前平移方面取得成功,但在恢复旋转松弛方面效果较差。目的:本研究旨在比较采用解剖技术对单束和双束ACL进行重建的结果,这些技术基于患者的原始ACL大小进行个性化。作者假设,当手术技术个性化时,解剖单束(ASB)和解剖双束(ADB)重建的结果之间不会有差异。研究设计:同类研究;证据级别:2。方法:根据术中对ACL插入位点大小的测量,选择患者进行ASB(n = 32)或ADB(n = 69)ACL重建。在所有组中,均使用绳肌腱自体移植,在股骨侧采用悬吊固定,在胫骨侧采用可生物吸收的干扰螺钉固定。结果由独立的盲人观察者使用Lysholm评分,主观国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)表格,KT-1000关节镜对前后稳定性以及旋转稳定性进行枢轴位移测试进行评估。平均随访时间为30个月(范围26-34个月)。两组的基线人口统计学差异无统计学意义。结果:ADB组和ASB组在Lysholm评分(93.9 vs 93.5),主观IKDC评分(93.3 vs 93.1),胫骨前移(1.5-mm和1.6-mm左右差异),以及枢轴偏移(92%对比枢轴偏移阴性检查的90%)。结论:采用个性化ACL重建技术时,解剖学上的双束重建并不优于解剖学上的单束重建。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号