首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Sports Medicine >Kinetic comparison among the fastball, curveball, change-up, and slider in collegiate baseball pitchers.
【24h】

Kinetic comparison among the fastball, curveball, change-up, and slider in collegiate baseball pitchers.

机译:高校棒球投手的快球,弯球,换人和滑门之间的动力学比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists about whether breaking pitches are more stressful than are fastballs. Previous biomechanical studies compared kinematics but not kinetics. HYPOTHESIS: Elbow and shoulder forces and torques are statistically different among the fastball, curveball, change-up, and slider. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Twenty-one healthy collegiate pitchers were studied with a high-speed automated digitizing system. All subjects threw fastballs (n = 21), most threw curveballs (n = 20) and change-ups (n = 19), and a few threw sliders (n = 6). Wrist, elbow, and shoulder kinetics were calculated using inverse dynamics. Nine kinetic and 26 kinematic parameters were compared among the different pitch types using repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: At the shoulder, internal rotation torque, horizontal adduction torque, abduction torque, and proximal force were significantly less in the change-up than in the other 3 pitches. Shoulder horizontal adduction torque was greater in the fastball than in the curveball and slider. Shoulder proximal force was greater in the slider than in the curveball. Elbow proximal force was less in the change-up than in the other 3 pitches. Elbow varus torque was greater in the fastball and curveball than in the change-up. Elbow flexion torque was greater in the curveball than in the change-up. The curveball and change-up demonstrated kinematic differences from the fastball, consistent with previous studies. CONCLUSION: There were significant kinematic differences between the fastball and curveball but few kinetic differences. The change-up had lower joint kinetics, lower angular velocities, and different body positions than the other 3 pitch types had. Results for the slider were inconclusive because of small sample size. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Because the resultant joint loads were similar between the fastball and curveball, this study did not indicate that either pitch was more stressful or potentially dangerous for a collegiate pitcher. The low kinetics in the change-up implies that it is the safest.
机译:背景:关于打破音高是否比快球更具压力存在争议。以前的生物力学研究只比较运动学,而不是动力学。假设:在快球,弯球,换头和滑杆之间,肘部和肩部的力和扭矩在统计上是不同的。研究设计:描述性实验室研究。方法:采用高速自动数字化系统研究了二十一个健康的大学投手。所有受试者都投掷快球(n = 21),大多数投掷曲棍球(n = 20)和换人(n = 19),还有一些投掷滑子(n = 6)。使用逆动力学计算腕部,肘部和肩膀的动力学。使用方差的重复测量分析,比较了不同音高类型中的九个动力学参数和26个运动学参数。结果:在肩部,内旋扭矩,水平内收扭矩,外展扭矩和近端力在换档时明显少于其他三个俯仰。快球中的肩部水平内收扭矩大于曲线球和滑块中的水平外收扭矩。滑块中的肩膀近侧力大于曲线球中的。弯头的近端力小于其他三个俯仰。快球和弯球中的肘内翻扭矩大于换人时的肘内翻扭矩。弯球中的肘部弯曲扭矩比换人时大。曲线球和换位动作与快球的运动学差异不同,与先前的研究一致。结论:快球和弧线运动之间存在明显的运动学差异,但动力学差异很小。与其他三种音高类型相比,这种变化具有较低的关节动力学,较低的角速度和不同的身体位置。滑块的结果不确定,因为样本量较小。临床相关性:由于在快球和弧线球之间产生的关节负荷相似,因此本研究并未表明俯仰对于大学投手而言压力更大或潜在危险。换向动力学低,意味着它是最安全的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号