...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Sports Medicine >Tendon-to-bone pressure distributions at a repaired rotator cuff footprint using transosseous suture and suture anchor fixation techniques.
【24h】

Tendon-to-bone pressure distributions at a repaired rotator cuff footprint using transosseous suture and suture anchor fixation techniques.

机译:使用穿骨缝线和缝线锚固技术在修复后的肩袖足迹上进行肌腱到骨的压力分布。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Interface contact pressure between the tendon and bone has been shown to influence healing. This study evaluates the interface pressure of the rotator cuff tendon to the greater tuberosity for different rotator cuff repair techniques. HYPOTHESIS: The transosseous tunnel rotator cuff repair technique provides larger pressure distributions over a defined insertion footprint than do suture anchor techniques. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Simulated rotator cuff tears over a 1 x 2-cm infraspinatus insertion footprint were created in 25 bovine shoulders. A transosseous tunnel simple suture technique (n = 8), suture anchor simple technique (n = 9), and suture anchor mattress technique (n = 8) were used for repair. Pressurized contact areas and mean pressures of the repaired tendon against the tuberosity were determined using pressure-sensitive film placed between the tendon and the tuberosity. RESULTS: The mean contact area between the tendon and tuberosity insertion footprint was significantly greater for the transosseous technique (67.7 +/- 5.8 mm(2)) compared with the suture anchor simple (34.1 +/- 9.4 mm(2)) and suture anchor mattress (26.0 +/- 5.3 mm(2)) techniques (P < .05). The mean interface pressure exerted over the footprint by the tendon was also greater for the transosseous technique (0.32 +/- 0.05 MPa) compared with the suture anchor simple (0.26 +/- 0.04 MPa) and suture anchor mattress (0.24 +/- 0.02 MPa) techniques (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The transosseous tunnel rotator cuff repair technique creates significantly more contact and greater overall pressure distribution over a defined footprint when compared with suture anchor techniques. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Stronger and faster rotator cuff healing may be expected when beneficial pressure distributions exist between the repaired rotator cuff and its insertion footprint. Tendon-to-tuberosity pressure and contact characteristics should be considered in the development of improved open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques.
机译:背景:肌腱与骨骼之间的界面接触压力已显示出会影响愈合。本研究针对不同的肩袖修复技术,评估了肩袖肌腱的界面压力至更大的结节度。假设:与缝线锚固技术相比,穿骨隧道肩袖修复技术可在规定的插入范围内提供更大的压力分布。研究设计:受控实验室研究。方法:在25个牛肩上模拟了1 x 2 cm的鼻下肌插入足迹上的肩袖撕裂。采用骨穿隧道简单缝合技术(n = 8),缝合锚简单技术(n = 9)和缝合锚床垫技术(n = 8)进行修复。使用位于肌腱和结节之间的压敏膜确定加压的接触面积和修复后的肌腱对结节的平均压力。结果:与简单的缝合锚钉(34.1 +/- 9.4 mm(2))和缝合线相比,经透骨技术(67.7 +/- 5.8 mm(2))的腱和结节插入足迹之间的平均接触面积明显更大。锚定床垫(26.0 +/- 5.3 mm(2))技术(P <.05)。与简单的缝合锚钉(0.26 +/- 0.04 MPa)和缝合锚钉床垫(0.24 +/- 0.02)相比,经骨技术对肌腱在足印上施加的平均界面压力也更大(0.32 +/- 0.05 MPa)。 MPa)技术(P <.05)。结论:与缝合锚固技术相比,穿骨隧道肩袖修复技术在一定的覆盖范围内可产生更多的接触并具有更大的整体压力分布。临床相关性:当修复后的肩袖及其插入脚印之间存在有利的压力分布时,可以期望更强,更快的肩袖愈合。在开发改良的开放式和关节镜式肩袖修复技术时,应考虑肌腱至结节的压力和接触特性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号