...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Sports Medicine >Acute achilles tendon rupture: a randomized, controlled study comparing surgical and nonsurgical treatments using validated outcome measures.
【24h】

Acute achilles tendon rupture: a randomized, controlled study comparing surgical and nonsurgical treatments using validated outcome measures.

机译:急性跟腱断裂:一项随机对照研究,使用经过验证的结局指标比较手术和非手术治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment for patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture. Few randomized controlled studies have compared outcomes after surgical or nonsurgical treatment with both groups receiving early mobilization. PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to compare outcomes of patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture treated with or without surgery using early mobilization and identical rehabilitation protocols. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients (79 men, 18 women; mean age, 41 years) with acute Achilles tendon rupture were treated and followed for 1 year. The primary end point was rerupturing. Patients were evaluated using the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), functional tests, and clinical examination at 6 and 12 months after injury. RESULTS: There were 6 (12%) reruptures in the nonsurgical group and 2 (4%) in the surgical group (P = .377). The mean 6- and 12-month ATRS were 72 and 88 points in the surgical group and 71 and 86 points in the nonsurgical group, respectively. Improvements in ATRS between 6 and 12 months were significant for both groups, with no significant between-group differences. At the 6-month evaluation, the surgical group had better results compared with the nonsurgically treated group in some of the muscle function tests; however, at the 12-month evaluation there were no differences between the 2 groups except for the heel-rise work test in favor of the surgical group. At the 12-month follow-up, the level of function of the injured leg remained significantly lower than that of the uninjured leg in both groups. CONCLUSION: The results of this study did not demonstrate any statistically significant difference between surgical and nonsurgical treatment. Furthermore, the study suggests that early mobilization is beneficial for patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture whether they are treated surgically or nonsurgically. The preferred treatment strategy for patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture remains a subject of debate. Although the study met the sample size dictated by the authors' a priori power calculation, the difference in the rerupture rate might be considered clinically important by some.
机译:背景:关于急性跟腱断裂患者的最佳治疗方法尚无共识。很少有随机对照研究比较两组接受早期动员的手术或非手术治疗后的结局。目的:本研究旨在通过早期动员和相同的康复方案比较接受或不接受手术治疗的急性跟腱断裂患者的预后。研究设计:随机对照试验;证据级别:1。方法:治疗了97例急性跟腱断裂患者(男79例,女18例;平均年龄41岁),随访1年。主要终点是破裂。在伤后6个月和12个月使用跟腱总断裂评分(ATRS),功能测试和临床检查对患者进行评估。结果:非手术组有6例(12%)破裂,手术组有2例(4%)破裂(P = .377)。手术组的平均6个月和12个月ATRS分别为72和88分,非手术组分别为71和86分。两组在6到12个月之间ATRS的改善都很显着,组间无显着差异。在6个月的评估中,在某些肌肉功能测试中,与非手术治疗组相比,手术组的效果更好。然而,在12个月的评估中,除了对手术组有利的脚跟抬高试验之外,两组之间没有差异。在12个月的随访中,两组受伤腿的功能水平均显着低于未受伤腿的功能水平。结论:这项研究的结果没有显示出手术和非手术治疗之间的统计学差异。此外,研究表明,无论是通过手术还是非手术治疗,早期动员对急性跟腱断裂患者都是有益的。急性跟腱断裂患者的首选治疗策略仍是争论的焦点。尽管该研究符合作者的先验能力计算所决定的样本量,但某些人可能认为复发率的差异在临床上很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号