...
首页> 外文期刊>Aphasiology >Single-word semantic judgements in semantic dementia: Do phonology and grammatical class count?
【24h】

Single-word semantic judgements in semantic dementia: Do phonology and grammatical class count?

机译:语义痴呆症中的单词语义判断:语音学和语法课是否计数?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Listeners make active use of phonological regularities such as word length to facilitate higher-level syntactic and semantic processing. For example, nouns are longer than verbs, and abstract words are longer than concrete words. Patients with semantic dementia (SD) experience conceptual loss with preserved syntax and phonology. The extent to which patients with SD exploit phonological regularities to support language processing remains unclear. Aims: We examined the ability of patients with SD (1) to perceive subtle acoustic-phonetic distinctions in English, and (2) to bootstrap their accuracy of lexical-semantic and syntactic judgements from regularities in the phonological forms of English nouns and verbs. Methods and Procedures: Four patients with SD made minimal pair judgements (same/ different) for auditorily presented stimuli selectively varied by voice, place, or manner of the initial consonant (e.g., pa -ba). In Experiment 2 patients made forced-choice semantic judgements (abstractor concrete) for single words varied by (1) concreteness (abstract or concrete); (2) grammatical class (noun or verb); and (3) word length (one- or three-syllable words). Outcomes and Results: The most semantically impaired patients paradoxically showed the highest accuracy of minimal pair phonologic discrimination. Judgements of word concreteness were less accurate for verbs than nouns. Among verbs, accuracy was worse for concrete than abstract items (e.g., eat was worse than think). Patients were more likely to misclassify longer concrete words (e.g., professor) as abstract, demonstrating sensitivity to an underlying phonologically mediated semantic property in English. Conclusions: Single-word semantic judgements were sensitive to both grammatical class and phonological properties of the words being evaluated. Theoretical and clinical implications are addressed in the context of an anatomically constrained model of SD that assumes increasing reliance on phonology as lexical-semantic knowledge degrades.
机译:背景:侦听者积极利用语音规则,例如单词长度,以促进更高层次的句法和语义处理。例如,名词比动词长,抽象词比具体词长。患有语义性痴呆(SD)的患者在保留语法和语音的情况下会遭受概念上的损失。 SD患者利用语音规则来支持语言处理的程度仍不清楚。目的:我们研究了SD患者(1)感知英语中语音细微差别的能力,以及(2)根据英语名词和动词的语音形式的规律性来引导其词汇语义和句法判断的准确性。方法和程序:四名SD患者对听觉呈现的刺激做出了最小的配对判断(相同/不同),该刺激根据声音,位置或初始辅音的方式(例如pa-ba)有选择地变化。在实验2中,患者对单字因(1)具体(抽象或具体)而有所选择进行语义选择(抽象)。 (2)语法课(名词或动词); (3)字长(一个或三个音节的单词)。结果和结果:语义受损最严重的患者自相矛盾地显示出最小的语音对语音识别的最高准确性。动词对单词具体性的判断不如名词准确。在动词中,具体的准确性比抽象的项目差(例如,吃饭比思考差)。患者更有可能将较长的具体单词(例如教授)误分类为抽象单词,这表明他们对英语中语音学介导的潜在语义特性的敏感性。结论:单字语义判断对所评估单词的语法分类和语音特性均敏感。理论和临床意义是在SD的解剖学约束模型的背景下解决的,该模型假定随着词汇语义知识的退化,对音系的依赖性越来越高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号