首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Emergency Medicine: Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians and the University Association for Emergency Medicine >Examining emergency department communication through a staff-based participatory research method: identifying barriers and solutions to meaningful change.
【24h】

Examining emergency department communication through a staff-based participatory research method: identifying barriers and solutions to meaningful change.

机译:通过基于员工的参与式研究方法检查急诊部门的沟通情况:确定实现有意义的变革的障碍和解决方案。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We test an initiative with the staff-based participatory research (SBPR) method to elicit communication barriers and engage staff in identifying strategies to improve communication within our emergency department (ED). METHODS: ED staff at an urban hospital with 85,000 ED visits per year participated in a 3.5-hour multidisciplinary workshop. The workshop was offered 6 times and involved: (1) large group discussion to review the importance of communication within the ED and discuss findings from a recent survey of patient perceptions of ED-team communication; (2) small group discussions eliciting staff perceptions of communication barriers and best practices/strategies to address these challenges; and (3) large group discussions sharing and refining emergent themes and suggested strategies. Three coders analyzed summaries from group discussions by using latent content and constant comparative analysis to identify focal themes. RESULTS: A total of 127 staff members, including attending physicians, residents, nurses, ED assistants, and secretaries, participated in the workshop (overall participation rate 59.6%; range 46.7% to 73.3% by staff type). Coders identified a framework of 4 themes describing barriers and proposed interventions: (1) greeting and initial interaction, (2) setting realistic expectations, (3) team communication and respect, and (4) information provision and delivery. The majority of participants (81.4%) reported that their participation would cause them to make changes in their clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Involving staff in discussing barriers and facilitators to communication within the ED can result in a meaningful process of empowerment, as well as the identification of feasible strategies and solutions at both the individual and system levels.
机译:研究目标:我们使用基于员工的参与式研究(SBPR)方法测试一项举措,以找出沟通障碍,并使员工参与确定改善急诊部(ED)内部沟通的策略。方法:每年有85,000次ED访问的城市医院的ED人员参加了一个3.5小时的多学科研讨会。该研讨会共举行了6次,涉及:(1)大型小组讨论,以审查ED内沟通的重要性,并讨论对患者对ED团队沟通的最新调查结果。 (2)小组讨论引起员工对沟通障碍以及应对这些挑战的最佳实践/策略的认识; (3)大型小组讨论,共享和完善新出现的主题和建议的策略。三位编码员通过使用潜在内容和不断的比较分析来确定焦点主题,从而分析了小组讨论的摘要。结果:共有127位工作人员参加了此次研讨会(包括主治医师,住院医师,护士,急诊助理和秘书)(总参加率为59.6%;按工作人员类型划分,参与率为46.7%至73.3%)。编码人员确定了一个描述障碍和拟议干预措施的4个主题的框架:(1)问候和初步互动;(2)设定切合实际的期望;(3)团队沟通和尊重;以及(4)信息提供和传递。大多数参与者(81.4%)报告说,他们的参与将导致他们改变他们的临床实践。结论:让员工参与讨论教育署内部沟通的障碍和促进者,可以导致有意义的赋权过程,并确定个人和系统层面的可行策略和解决方案。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号