...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of epidemiology >Nonpersistent pesticide exposure self-report versus biomonitoring in farm pesticide applicators.
【24h】

Nonpersistent pesticide exposure self-report versus biomonitoring in farm pesticide applicators.

机译:非持久性农药暴露自我报告与农场农药施用器中生物监测的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Few studies using biologic markers to examine nonpersistent pesticide exposure among pesticide applicators were conducted in field settings. This study compares self-reported dermal, inhalation, and ingestion exposures with urinalysis results after one-time application of the commonly used herbicide atrazine to field crops. It was hypothesized that: i) applicator reports of exposure would be associated positively with detection of urinary atrazine metabolites, and ii) applicator reports of personal-protective-equipment (PPE) use would be associated negatively with detection of urinary atrazine metabolites. METHODS: Wisconsin dairy farmers were randomly selected to participate in 1997 to 1998 and were instructed to collect a urine sample 8 hours after the first pesticide application of the season. Farmers then were interviewed within 1 week of their first application to report on application practices. Eighty-six urine samples were analyzed for deethylatrazine, a major atrazine metabolite. RESULTS: Comparing urinalysis results with self-reported dermal, inhalation, and ingestion exposure showed poor agreement between self-reported exposure and urinary deethylatrazine detections (all kappa < 0.40). Multivariate linear regression modeling with deethylatrazine level as the outcome showed that self-reported practices did not significantly predict atrazine metabolite levels. CONCLUSIONS: Possible explanations for the discrepancies between urinalysis results and self-reported data include: i) inaccuracies in self-reported data and ii) substantial interpersonal variation in atrazine metabolism, resulting in major differences in body burden for similar exposures. Either explanation poses challenges for epidemiologic studies of the health effects of pesticides, which rely solely on self-reported measures of exposure. Additional evaluation of determinants of accuracy in self-assessed occupational and environmental exposures is needed.
机译:目的:在田间环境中很少进行使用生物标记物研究农药施用者中非持久性农药暴露的研究。这项研究将一次性使用除草剂at去津一次施用到田间作物后,将自我报告的皮肤,吸入和摄入暴露与尿液分析结果进行了比较。假设:i)涂药者的暴露报告与尿阿特拉津代谢产物的检测呈正相关,ii)涂药者的个人防护设备(PPE)使用报告与尿阿特拉津的代谢产物呈负相关。方法:从1997年至1998年,随机选择威斯康星州的奶农参加该季节,并被要求在该季节首次施药8小时后收集尿液样本。然后,在首次申请后的1周内对农民进行了采访,以报告申请做法。分析了八十六个尿液样本中的去乙基阿特拉津(一种主要的阿特拉津代谢产物)。结果:将尿液分析结果与自我报告的皮肤,吸入和摄入暴露进行比较,发现自我报告的暴露与尿液中去乙基阿特拉津的检测结果之间的一致性差(所有kappa <0.40)。结果以去乙基阿特拉津水平为变量的多元线性回归模型表明,自我报告的方法并不能显着预测阿特拉津代谢产物的水平。结论:尿液分析结果与自我报告数据之间差异的可能解释包括:i)自我报告数据不准确,以及ii)阿特拉津代谢的人际差异很大,导致相似暴露量的人体负担存在重大差异。两种解释都对农药对健康的影响进行流行病学研究提出了挑战,这些研究仅依赖于自我报告的接触指标。需要对自我评估的职业和环境暴露准确性的决定因素进行额外评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号