首页> 外文期刊>Behavioural Brain Research: An International Journal >Effects of chronic footshock, restraint and corticotropin-releasing factor on freezing, ultrasonic vocalization and forced swim behavior in rats.
【24h】

Effects of chronic footshock, restraint and corticotropin-releasing factor on freezing, ultrasonic vocalization and forced swim behavior in rats.

机译:慢性足震,束缚和促肾上腺皮质激素释放因子对大鼠冰冻,超声发声和强迫游泳行为的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The effects of chronic footshock (CFS) or chronic restraint (CRS) on the behavioral responses to acute footshock and corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) were studied. Male rats were subjected to either footshock or restraint daily, or left undisturbed (Quiet). After 7 or 14 days treatment, they were placed in an unfamiliar footshock chamber and three footshocks administered at 20s intervals and subsequent freezing and ultrasonic vocalizations (USV's) were recorded. Context-conditioned freezing and USV's were recorded when rats were replaced in the chamber in which they had received the three footshocks. Prior CFS treatment decreased acute footshock-induced freezing and USV's, whereas it increased conditioned freezing and slightly increased conditioned USV's. CRS did not affect footshock-induced freezing, but in contrast to CFS, strongly increased USV's. Intracerebroventricular CRF (30 or 100ng) alone did not elicit freezing in either Quiet or CFS rats, nor did it have any effect on shock-induced freezing in either group. However, CRF increased conditioned freezing in Quiet, but not in CFS rats. CRF alone did not trigger USV's, but slightly increased shock-induced USV's in both Quiet and CFS rats, and significantly increased conditioned USV's in CFS rats. In the forced swim test (FST), chronic footshock did not induce consistent effects, although there was a trend to increased immobility. However, CRF increased immobility. In striking contrast to CFS, chronic restraint consistently decreased immobility. It is concluded that chronic stress has lasting effects on defensive responses. However, not all chronic stress procedures exert the same effects and thus different forms of stress may activate different neural mechanisms. The fact that CFS diminished shock-induced freezing and the effects of CRF on conditioned freezing suggests that CFS desensitizes the brain to CRF. On the other hand, the enhancement of conditioned freezing by CFS, and of conditioned USV's by CRF in CFS rats, indicates more complex effects.
机译:研究了慢性足震(CFS)或慢性约束(CRS)对急性足震和促肾上腺皮质激素释放因子(CRF)行为反应的影响。每天对雄性大鼠进行震荡或束缚,或使其不受干扰(安静)。治疗7或14天后,将它们放置在陌生的休克室中,并以20秒的间隔进行3次脚掌震击,并记录随后的冷冻和超声发声(USV)。当将大鼠放回接受三只足底震颤的室中时,记录了环境条件下的冻结和USV。先前的CFS治疗降低了急性足电击伤引起的冰冻和USV,而其增加了条件性冰冻,并稍微增加了条件性USV。 CRS不会影响休克引起的冻结,但与CFS相比,USV会大大增加。在安静或CFS大鼠中,单独的脑室内CRF(30或100ng)都不会引起冰冻,在任何一组中,它都不会对休克引起的冰冻产生任何影响。但是,CRF增加了Quiet中的条件冻结,但没有增加CFS大鼠中的条件冻结。单独的CRF不会触发USV,但是在安静和CFS大鼠中都会稍微增加休克诱发的USV,在CFS大鼠中显着增加条件性USV。在强迫游泳试验(FST)中,尽管有增加不动的趋势,但慢性足震并没有产生持续的影响。但是,CRF增加了固定性。与CFS形成鲜明对比的是,慢性约束持续减少了动静。结论是,长期压力对防御反应具有持久的影响。但是,并非所有的慢性应激程序都发挥相同的作用,因此不同形式的应激可能会激活不同的神经机制。 CFS减少了休克引起的冰冻以及CRF对条件性冰冻的影响这一事实表明CFS使大脑对CRF失去敏感性。另一方面,在CFS大鼠中,CFS对条件冷冻的增强和CRF对条件USV的增强指示了更复杂的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号