首页> 外文期刊>Annals of vascular surgery >Has the emergence of endovascular treatment for aneurysmal and occlusive aortic disease increased the complexity and difficulty of open aortic operations?
【24h】

Has the emergence of endovascular treatment for aneurysmal and occlusive aortic disease increased the complexity and difficulty of open aortic operations?

机译:血管内治疗动脉瘤和闭塞性主动脉疾病的出现是否增加了开腹主动脉手术的复杂性和难度?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With the emergence of endovascular surgery, there is a perception that open aortic procedures for aneurysmal and occlusive disease have become more difficult. To test this hypothesis, two consecutive groups of patients undergoing open aortic surgery for aneurysmal (AAA) and occlusive (AIOD) disease before and after the establishment of an endovascular program (EP) were analyzed. The pre-EP patient group (January 1996 through December 1997) consisted of 112 patients (52 with AAA, 60 with AIOD) and the post-EP patient group (January 2000 through December 2001) consisted of 142 patients (72 with AAA, 70 with AIOD). The pre-EP AAA group was compared with the post-EP AAA group and the pre-EP AIOD group was compared with the post-EP AIOD group. Factors analyzed included patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative outcomes. Statistical comparisons were carried out using Fisher's exact test for proportions and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for medians. There were no statistical differences in patient demographics between the pre-EP and post-EP groups, regardless of procedure. When considering AAA repair, there was a higher rate of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia in the pre-EP group and a higher number of total comorbidities per patient in the post-EP group. There was also an increased incidence of perioperative blood transfusion in the post-EP group. When considering open procedures for AIOD, there was an increased rate of hypertension and history of previous abdominal operation in the post-EP group. There also was an increased incidence of perioperative blood transfusion. Other than these factors, there were no statistically significant differences between the pre- and post-EP groups with regard to mortality, complication rate, length of procedure, blood loss, length of ICU stay, or length of hospital stay for either the aneurysmal patients or the occlusive disease patients. With only minor exception, endovascular surgery has not appreciably increased the complexity of open aortic operations performed for either AAA or AIOD.
机译:随着血管内手术的出现,人们已经认识到,开放性主动脉手术对于动脉瘤和闭塞性疾病变得更加困难。为了验证该假设,分析了在建立血管内程序(EP)之前和之后接受动脉瘤(AAA)和闭塞性(AIOD)疾病接受开腹主动脉手术的连续两组患者。 EP前患者组(1996年1月至1997年12月)包括112例患者(52例AAA,60例AIOD),EP后患者组(2000年1月至2001年12月)包括142例患者(72例AAA,70例)与AIOD)。将EP前AAA组与EP后AAA组进行比较,并将EP AIOD前组与EP AIOD后组进行比较。分析的因素包括患者的人口统计学,合并症和手术结局。使用费舍尔精确检验的比例和威尔科克森秩和检验的中位数进行统计比较。不论采用何种程序,EP前和EP后组之间的患者人口统计学差异均无统计学差异。当考虑AAA修复时,EP前组的高血压和高胆固醇血症发生率更高,EP后组的每位患者总合并症数量更高。 EP后组围手术期输血的发生率也增加。当考虑开放性AIOD手术时,EP后组的高血压发生率和先前腹部手术史增加。围手术期输血的发生率也增加了。除这些因素外,EP前后组在动脉瘤患者的死亡率,并发症发生率,手术时间,失血量,ICU住院时间或住院时间方面均无统计学差异。或闭塞性疾病患者。除极少数例外,血管内手术并未明显增加对AAA或AIOD进行开腹主动脉手术的复杂性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号