...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychoeducational assessment >Study of the Factor Structure, Profiles, and Concurrent Validity of the Mindset Assessment Profile Tool for Elementary Students
【24h】

Study of the Factor Structure, Profiles, and Concurrent Validity of the Mindset Assessment Profile Tool for Elementary Students

机译:基本学生心态评估概况工具的因子结构,谱和并发有效性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study explored the underlying latent structure of items on the Mindset Assessment Profile (MAP) tool, explored whether subgroups of students exist based on the latent structure of MAP items, and tested whether subgroups were differentiated on standardized measures of reading comprehension, vocabulary, and word reading. Participants included 431 fourth-grade students. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that a three-factor model provided the most parsimonious fit to the data. Results of exploratory finite mixture model analysis with auxiliary regression suggested five classes of students, with the students categorized as growth mindset—high effort profile having the highest observed reading comprehension ( M = 451.98 and SD = 38.88) and vocabulary ( M = 454.37 and SD = 34.74) scores. By contrast, students categorized as fixed mindset—higher effort had the lowest observed reading comprehension and vocabulary scores. Limitations and directions for future research, and implications for using MAP assessment to inform intervention are discussed.
机译:本研究探索了思维评估档案(MAP)工具中项目的潜在结构,探索了学生是否存在基于MAP项目潜在结构的亚组,并测试了亚组是否在阅读理解、词汇和单词阅读的标准化测量上有所区别。参与者包括431名四年级学生。验证性因素分析显示,三因素模型对数据的拟合最为简洁。探索性有限混合模型分析和辅助回归的结果表明,有五个班级的学生,其中被归类为“成长心态-高努力模式”的学生的阅读理解(M=451.98和SD=38.88)和词汇(M=454.37和SD=34.74)得分最高。相比之下,被归类为固定思维的学生,努力程度较高的学生的阅读理解和词汇得分最低。讨论了未来研究的局限性和方向,以及使用MAP评估为干预提供信息的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号