首页> 外文期刊>Annals of oncology: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology >Phase II randomised trial comparing docetaxel given every 3 weeks with weekly schedule as second-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
【24h】

Phase II randomised trial comparing docetaxel given every 3 weeks with weekly schedule as second-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

机译:II期随机试验比较了每3周给予多西他赛与每周时间表作为晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的二线治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Taxotere(R) (docetaxel) at the dose of 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks is a standard therapy for pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety profile of two schedules of docetaxel administration (every 3 weeks versus weekly) in patients with pretreated NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From February 2000 to February 2001, 125 patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were randomised after failure of a previous platinum-based regimen to receive either docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) administered every 3 weeks (Dq3w) or docetaxel 40 mg/m(2) given weekly for 6 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest (Dqw). Safety evaluations focused on grade 3-4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, nausea-vomiting and asthenia. RESULTS: Patients' characteristics were well balanced between arms. The most common National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia, which occurred in 48.4% of Dq3w patients versus 15.9% of Dqw patients (P=0.001). In addition, febrile neutropenia were observed in 6.5% of patients in Dq3w versus 0% in Dqw. Grade 3-4 asthenia was more frequent in Dqw. Other non-haematological toxicities were very rare. Regarding efficacy, there was a trend towards a better disease control rate in Dq3w: 32.2% versus 25.4% in Dqw. Median time to progression and survival were rather similar in both arms, respectively: 2.1 months (range 2-3.2) and 5.8 months (range 4.0-7.0) in Dq3w and 1.8 months (range 1.6-2.3) and 5.5 months (range 3.7-6.6) in Dqw. CONCLUSIONS: While both schedules had a favourable safety profile, a significant lower rate of severe neutropenia was observed in the weekly arm. Both regimens had similar efficacy. The weekly regimen could be considered as a good alternative for patients at risk of severe neutropenia.
机译:背景:每3周以75 mg / m(2)的剂量服用(多西他赛)是预处理的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准疗法。这项研究的目的是评估经过预处理的NSCLC患者的两种多西紫杉醇给药方案(每3周对比每周一次)的安全性。患者与方法:从2000年2月至2001年2月,在先前的铂类方案治疗失败后,每3周(Dq3w)给予多西他赛75 mg / m(2)或多西紫杉醇治疗的125例局部晚期或转移性NSCLC患者被随机分配每周给予40 mg / m(2),持续6周,然后休息2周(Dqw)。安全性评估集中在3-4级中性粒细胞减少,发热性中性粒细胞减少,恶心呕吐和乏力。结果:患者的特征在两臂之间平衡良好。最常见的美国国家癌症研究所常见毒性标准(NCI-CTC)3-4级毒性反应是中性粒细胞减少症,Dq3w患者的发生率为48.4%,Dqw患者的发生率为15.9%(P = 0.001)。此外,Dq3w组中有6.5%的患者出现发热性中性粒细胞减少,而Dqw组为0%。 Dqw的3-4级乏力更为常见。其他非血液学毒性非常罕见。关于功效,Dq3w有更好的疾病控制率的趋势:Dqw为32.2%,而Dqw为25.4%。两组的平均进展时间和存活时间相当相似:Dq3w分别为2.1个月(范围2-3.2)和5.8个月(范围4.0-7.0)和1.8个月(范围1.6-2.3)和5.5个月(范围3.7- 6.6)。结论:尽管两个时间表都具有良好的安全性,但每周观察到严重中性粒细胞减少的比率显着降低。两种方案的疗效相似。对于有严重中性粒细胞减少症风险的患者,每周治疗方案可以被认为是一个很好的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号