首页> 外文期刊>The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery: MRCAS >Comparison of perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted radical cystectomy and laparoscopic radical cystectomy
【24h】

Comparison of perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted radical cystectomy and laparoscopic radical cystectomy

机译:机器人辅助自由基膀胱切除术和腹腔镜自由基膀胱切除术的围手术期结果的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: To report perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted radical cystectomy and laparoscopic radical cystectomy. Patients and Methods: Between January 2010 and July 2019, 298 patients with bladder cancer underwent robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) (n = 172) and laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) (n = 126) at our institution were enrolled in the retrospective study. The demographic, perioperative, and complication data were collected and analyzed. Results: The RARC group had less operative duration (P < .001), less blood loss (P < .001), lower transfusion rate (P < .05), and shorter hospital stay (P < .001) than the LRC group. The 90-day readmission rate between the RARC and LRC group had no significant differences (P = .401). The 90-day overall complication rates in the RARC group was much lower than the LRC group (P = .009). The 90-day minor complication rates (Clavien-Dindo grade < IIA) between the RARC and LRC groups were similar (P = .274). The 90-day major complication rates (Clavien-Dindo grade > IIIA) in the LRC group was higher than the RARC group (P = .022). Conclusions: The RARC approach appears to offer some operative and perioperative benefits compared with the LRC approach. Larger, randomized studies are required to confirm these findings.
机译:目的:报告机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术和腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的围手术期结果。患者和方法:在2010年1月至2019年7月期间,我们机构共有298名膀胱癌患者接受了机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)(n=172)和腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术(LRC)(n=126)的回顾性研究。收集并分析人口统计学、围手术期和并发症数据。结果:与LRC组相比,RARC组手术时间短(P<0.001),失血量少(P<0.001),输血率低(P<0.05),住院时间短(P<0.001)。RARC组和LRC组的90天再入院率无显著差异(P=0.401)。RARC组的90天总并发症发生率远低于LRC组(P=0.009)。RARC组和LRC组的90天轻微并发症发生率(Clavien Dindo评分IIIA)高于RARC组(P=0.022)。结论:与LRC方法相比,RARC方法似乎提供了一些手术和围手术期益处。需要更大规模的随机研究来证实这些发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号