首页> 外文期刊>The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery: MRCAS >Comparing the accuracy of the da Vinci Xi and da Vinci Si for image guidance and automation
【24h】

Comparing the accuracy of the da Vinci Xi and da Vinci Si for image guidance and automation

机译:比较Da Vinci Xi和Da Vinci SI的准确性,实现图像指导和自动化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Current laparoscopic surgical robots are teleoperated, which requires high fidelity differential motions but does not require absolute accuracy. Emerging applications, including image guidance and automation, require absolute accuracy. The absolute accuracy of the da Vinci Xi robot has not yet been characterized or compared to the Si system, which is now being phased out. This study compares the accuracy of the two. Methods: We measure robot tip positions and encoder values assessing accuracy with and without robot calibration. Results: The Si is accurate if the setup joints are not moved but loses accuracy otherwise. The Xi is always accurate. Conclusion: The Xi can achieve submillimetric average error. Calibration improves accuracy, but excellent baseline accuracy of the Xi means that calibration may not be needed for some applications. Importantly, the external tracking systems needed to account for setup joint error in the Si are no longer required with the Xi.
机译:背景:目前的腹腔镜手术机器人是远程操作的,需要高保真的差动运动,但不需要绝对的准确性。新兴应用,包括图像引导和自动化,要求绝对准确。达文西席机器人的绝对精度尚未被表征或与SI系统相比,该系统现在已逐步淘汰。这项研究比较了两者的准确性。方法:我们测量机器人尖端位置和编码器值,评估机器人校准前后的准确性。结果:如果设置关节未移动,Si是准确的,否则将失去准确性。席总是准确的。结论:席能达到亚毫米平均误差。校准提高了精度,但是席的优良基线精度意味着对于某些应用来说,校准可能不需要。重要的是,在席上不再需要考虑SI中设置关节误差的外部跟踪系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号