...
首页> 外文期刊>Palliative medicine >A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing burden from lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
【24h】

A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing burden from lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

机译:对肺癌和慢性阻塞性肺病的负担进行系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung cancer are both life-limiting diseases that confer burden in the form of symptoms and affect functioning and quality of life. Comparing burden between these diseases is of interest to determine whether people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease require improved access to Specialist Palliative Care. Access should be based on needs rather than diagnosis or prognosis but is limited for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease compared to lung cancer. Aim: The aim of this study was to synthesise research comparing burden from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung cancer to estimate relative need for Specialist Palliative Care. Design: A systematic review was conducted of observational quantitative studies published in English peer-reviewed journals comparing burden from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung cancer (PROSPERO CRD42018108819). No limits were placed on disease stage. Meta-analyses were performed where studies used the same measure; otherwise, synthesis used a narrative approach. Risk of bias was assessed using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality tool. Data sources: Electronic databases were searched in September 2019. Results: Of 790 articles returned, 13 were included, reporting 11 studies. Risk of bias was generally moderate. Except for pain, burden tended to be at least as substantial from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as from lung cancer, with breathlessness and impacts on functioning being significantly worse. Longitudinal studies suggest that people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease live with burden for longer. Conclusion: Efforts should be made to ensure that access to Specialist Palliative Care is commensurate with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease's substantial and long-lasting burden. Future research should clarify whether managing burden in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung cancer requires different approaches.
机译:背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病和肺癌都是限制生命的疾病,它们以症状的形式带来负担,影响功能和生活质量。比较这些疾病之间的负担有助于确定慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者是否需要更好地获得专科姑息治疗。应根据需要,而不是诊断或预后进行访问,但与肺癌相比,慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的访问受到限制。目的:本研究的目的是综合比较慢性阻塞性肺疾病和肺癌患者负担的研究,以估计对专科姑息治疗的相对需求。《慢性阻塞性肺疾病的定量研究》发表于2011年的《慢性阻塞性肺疾病的定量研究》杂志上。疾病阶段没有限制。在使用相同测量的研究中进行荟萃分析;除此之外,综合采用了叙事方法。使用医疗保健研究和质量机构工具评估偏倚风险。数据来源:2019年9月搜索了电子数据库。结果:在返回的790篇文章中,13篇被纳入,报告了11项研究。偏见的风险一般是中等的。除疼痛外,慢性阻塞性肺疾病的负担往往至少与肺癌一样沉重,呼吸困难和对功能的影响显著恶化。纵向研究表明,慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的生活负担更长。结论:应努力确保获得专科姑息治疗的机会与慢性阻塞性肺疾病的实质性和长期负担相称。未来的研究应该澄清,慢性阻塞性肺疾病和肺癌的负担管理是否需要不同的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号