首页> 外文期刊>Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy >Antidepressant and Group Psychosocial Treatment for Depression: A Rater Blind Exploratory RCT from a Low Income Country
【24h】

Antidepressant and Group Psychosocial Treatment for Depression: A Rater Blind Exploratory RCT from a Low Income Country

机译:抗抑郁药和抑郁症的团体心理社会治疗:来自低收入国家的盲人探索性随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Research in the West shows that group psychological intervention together with an antidepressant treatment leads to more effective treatment of a depressive disorder. There are no treatment trials from low income countries comparing the efficacy of antidepressant treatment with a group psychological intervention. Aim: To conduct a feasibility trial to compare the efficacy of an antidepressant to a group psychosocial intervention, for low income women attending primary health care in Karachi, Pakistan. Method: This was a preliminary RCT in an urban primary health care clinic in Karachi, Pakistan. Consecutive eligible women scoring > 12 on the CIS-R and > 18 on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) (n = 66) were randomly assigned to antidepressants or a psychosocial treatment in group settings. The primary outcome measure was HDRS score; secondary outcome measures were disability and quality of life. Results: More than half of the patients in both groups improved (50% reduction in HDRS scores); at end of therapy at 3 months 19 (59.4%) vs 18 (56.2%), and at 6-month follow-up 21(67.7%) vs 20(62.5%) for antidepressants and psychosocial intervention respectively. Although HDRS, BDQ and EQ5-D scores all improved considerably in both groups from start to end of treatment, and these improvements were largely maintained after a further 3 months, the differences between the two treatments were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Psychosocial intervention was as effective as antidepressants in reducing depression and in improving quality of life and disability at the end of therapy. However, these findings need further exploration through a larger trial.
机译:背景:西方的研究表明,集体心理干预与抗抑郁药治疗可以导致对抑郁症的更有效治疗。低收入国家尚无治疗试验,将抗抑郁治疗与集体心理干预相比较。目的:进行一项可行性试验,以比较抗抑郁药与团体心理社会干预对巴基斯坦卡拉奇接受初级保健的低收入妇女的疗效。方法:这是在巴基斯坦卡拉奇市一家城市初级卫生保健诊所进行的一项初步随机对照试验。连续符合条件的女性在CIS-R中得分> 12,在汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS)中得分> 18(n = 66),被随机分配到抗抑郁药或社会心理治疗组中。主要结局指标为HDRS评分;次要结果指标是残疾和生活质量。结果:两组患者中超过一半的患者好转(HDRS得分降低了50%);在治疗结束后的3个月,抗抑郁药和社会心理干预分别为19(59.4%)vs 18(56.2%)和6个月随访时21(67.7%)vs 20(62.5%)。尽管从治疗开始到结束,两组的HDRS,BDQ和EQ5-D评分均显着改善,并且这些改善在再过3个月后仍基本保持,但两种治疗之间的差异在统计学上并不显着。结论:在治疗结束时,社会心理干预与抗抑郁药一样有效,可减少抑郁症并改善生活质量和残疾。但是,这些发现需要通过更大的试验来进一步探索。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号