...
首页> 外文期刊>Analytical methods >A comparative study of three modifications of the QuEChERS method for determination of endocrine disrupting pesticide residues in lemon matrices by fast GC-MS
【24h】

A comparative study of three modifications of the QuEChERS method for determination of endocrine disrupting pesticide residues in lemon matrices by fast GC-MS

机译:快速GC-MS测定QuEChERS方法对柠檬基质中内分泌干扰农药残留的三种改良方法的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Three modifications of the QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe) method for determination of 35 endocrine disrupting pesticides in samples with high acid content such as lemons were studied. Pesticides extraction was performed using the original QuEChERS method, citrate buffered QuEChERS method (EU version) and acetate buffered QuEChERS method (AOAC version). Final extracts were evaluated by fast gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. Validation experiments for all three methods were performed using a spiked pesticide free lemon matrix and matrix-matched standard solutions. Four concentration levels (1, 20, 50 and 250 μg kg~(-1)) were tested. Recoveries from 70 to 120% with a relative standard deviation <20% were obtained for the majority of pesticides. Linearity was evaluated at a concentration range of 1-250 μg kg~(-1) for the buffered QuEChERS (AOAC) method with coefficients of determination (R~2) higher than 0.9552 and for the original QuEChERS method with R~2 higher than 0.9232. The best linearity was obtained for the citrate buffered method with R~2 higher than 0.9656. The limit of detection (LOD) of the buffered QuEChERS (AOAC) method ranged between 0.1 and 18.4 μg kg~(-1), for the citrate buffered QuEChERS method between 0.1 and 23.6 μg kg~(-1) and for the original QuEChERS method between 0.1 and 14.2 μgkg~(-1).ResultsobtainedbythethreedifferentQuEChERS methods were compared. The citrate buffered method is more suitable for the tested pesticides than the other two QuEChERS methods. Although the QuEChERS method is widely applied, it was shown that in difficult matrices such as lemons, the choice of modifications is analyte/matrix dependent. The three developed and validated methods were applied to the analysis of real citrus samples.
机译:研究了QuEChERS方法的三种改进方法(快速,简便,便宜,有效,坚固和安全),用于测定柠檬酸等高酸含量样品中的35种破坏内分泌的农药。使用原始QuEChERS方法,柠檬酸盐缓冲QuEChERS方法(欧盟版本)和乙酸盐缓冲QuEChERS方法(AOAC版本)进行农药提取。通过快速气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)分析评估最终提取物。所有三种方法的验证实验均使用加标的无农药柠檬基质和基质匹配的标准溶液进行。测试了四个浓度水平(1、20、50和250μgkg〜(-1))。大多数农药的回收率在70%至120%之间,相对标准偏差<20%。对于缓冲QuEChERS(AOAC)方法的测定系数(R〜2)高于0.9552,对于原始QuEChERS方法在R〜2高于0.02的浓度范围内,在1-250μgkg〜(-1)范围内评估线性0.9232。柠檬酸盐缓冲方法获得了最佳线性,R〜2高于0.9656。缓冲QuEChERS(AOAC)方法的检出限(LOD)为0.1至18.4μgkg〜(-1),柠檬酸盐缓冲QuEChERS方法为0.1至23.6μgkg〜(-1)和原始QuEChERS方法在0.1和14.2μgkg〜(-1)之间。比较了三种不同的QuEChERS方法获得的结果。柠檬酸盐缓冲方法比其他两种QuEChERS方法更适合于测试的农药。尽管QuEChERS方法得到了广泛应用,但事实表明,在困难的基质(如柠檬)中,修饰的选择取决于分析物/基质。这三种已开发和验证的方法被用于分析真实的柑橘样品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号