首页> 外文期刊>Annals of allergy, asthma, and immunology >The above correspondence was referred to the original authors who provided the following response
【24h】

The above correspondence was referred to the original authors who provided the following response

机译:上面的信件是提供给以下作者的原始作者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We acknowledge that our retrospective survey regarding "safety" needle use in outpatient allergy patients has limitations. The questioning of certain possible biases is legitimate. Perhaps our survey results should not be generalized to all allergy practices, but they are surely specific to all practices that reported higher accidental needle sticks when using safety needles. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration' s current policy regarding safety needle use in outpatient practices was instituted in the absence of any directly relevant safety data. Likewise, approval of multiple safety devices without comparative safety trials further obscured the landscape
机译:我们承认,关于门诊过敏患者使用“安全”针头的回顾性调查存在局限性。对某些可能偏见的质疑是合理的。也许我们的调查结果不应该推广到所有过敏实践,但肯定是针对所有报告使用安全针时意外针刺较多的实践。在没有任何直接相关的安全数据的情况下,制定了美国职业安全与健康管理局(SAFE)当前有关在门诊实践中使用安全针的政策。同样,在未经比较安全性试验的情况下批准多个安全装置进一步模糊了局面

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号