首页> 外文期刊>Annals of allergy, asthma, and immunology >Combination therapy with azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray and fluticasone propionate nasal spray in the treatment of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
【24h】

Combination therapy with azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray and fluticasone propionate nasal spray in the treatment of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

机译:盐酸氮卓斯汀鼻喷雾剂和丙酸氟替卡松鼻喷雾剂联合治疗季节性变应性鼻炎患者。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, there are no published studies that evaluated the efficacy of azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray in combination with an intranasal corticosteroid, although anecdotal reports of the use of these agents in combination are common. OBJECTIVE: To determine if greater efficacy could be achieved with the intranasal antihistamine azelastine and the intranasal corticosteroid fluticasone propionate used concurrently compared with the efficacy of each agent alone. METHODS: This randomized, 2-week, multicenter, double-blind trial was conducted during the Texas mountain cedar season. After a 5-day placebo lead-in period, 151 patients with moderate to severe nasal symptoms were randomized to treatment with the following: (1) azelastine nasal spray, 2 sprays per nostril twice daily; (2) fluticasone nasal spray, 2 sprays per nostril once daily; or (3) azelastine nasal spray, 2 sprays per nostril twice daily, plus fluticasone nasal spray, 2 sprays per nostril once daily. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in the total nasal symptom score (TNSS), consisting of sneezing, itchy nose, runny nose, and nasal congestion. RESULTS: All 3 groups had statistically significant (P < .001) improvements from their baseline TNSS after 2 weeks of treatment. The TNSS improved 27.1% with fluticasone nasal spray, 24.8% with azelastine nasal spray, and 37.9% with the 2 agents in combination (P < .05 vs either agent alone). All 3 treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The significant improvement in the TNSS with combination therapy relative to the individual agents alone is in contrast to previously published studies that found no advantage with an oral antihistamine and an intranasal corticosteroid in combination. Azelastine nasal spray and fluticasone nasal spray in combination may provide a substantial therapeutic benefit for patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis compared with therapy with either agent alone.
机译:背景:据我们所知,尚无发表的研究评估盐酸氮卓斯汀鼻喷雾剂与鼻内皮质类固醇激素合用的疗效,尽管有关这些药物合用的轶事报道很普遍。目的:与单独使用每种药物的疗效相比,确定同时使用鼻内抗组胺氮卓斯汀和鼻内皮质类固醇氟替卡松丙酸酯能否达到更大的疗效。方法:该随机,为期2周,多中心,双盲试验在德克萨斯州雪松季节进行。在为期5天的安慰剂导入期后,将151例中度至重度鼻部症状患者随机分配至以下治疗:(1)氮卓斯汀鼻喷剂,每个鼻孔2喷剂,每日两次; (2)氟替卡松鼻喷雾剂,每个鼻孔每日2次喷雾剂;或(3)氮卓斯汀鼻喷雾剂,每个鼻孔每天2次,每次两次,再加上氟替卡松鼻喷雾剂,每个鼻孔每天两次,一次。主要功效变量是总鼻症状评分(TNSS)相对于基线的变化,包括打喷嚏,鼻痒,流鼻涕和鼻充血。结果:所有3组在治疗2周后均较其基线TNSS有统计学显着性改善(P <.001)。氟替卡松鼻喷雾剂的TNSS改善了27.1%,氮卓斯汀鼻喷雾剂的TNSS改善了24.8%,两种药物联合使用时的TNSS改善了37.9%(P <.05,与单独使用两种药物相比)。所有3种治疗均耐受良好。结论:相对于单独使用单独的药物,联合治疗对TNSS的显着改善与先前发表的研究相反,该研究发现口服抗组胺药和鼻内皮质类固醇的联合治疗无优势。氮卓斯汀鼻喷雾剂和氟替卡松鼻喷雾剂的组合与单独使用任何一种药物的治疗相比,对于季节性过敏性鼻炎患者可能提供实质性的治疗益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号