首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of earthquake engineering >A robust empirical model to estimate earthquake-induced excess pore water pressure in saturated and non-saturated soils
【24h】

A robust empirical model to estimate earthquake-induced excess pore water pressure in saturated and non-saturated soils

机译:一种稳健的实证模型,以估算饱和和非饱和土壤中的抗震诱导的过量孔隙水压力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In engineering practice, the liquefaction potential of a sandy soil is usually evaluated with a semi-empirical, stress-based approach computing a factor of safety in free field conditions, defined as the ratio between the liquefaction resistance (capacity) and the seismic demand. By so doing, an estimate of liquefaction potential is obtained, but nothing is known on the pore pressure increments (often expressed in the form of normalized pore pressure ratio r(u)) generated by the seismic action when the safety factor is higher than 1. Even though r(u)can be estimated using complex numerical analyses, it would be extremely useful to have a simplified procedure to estimate them consistent with the stress-based approach adopted to check the safety conditions. This paper proposes such a procedure with reference to both saturated and unsaturated soils, considering the latter as soils for which partial saturation has been artificially generated with some ground improvement technology to increase cyclic strength and thus tackle liquefaction risk. A simple relationship between the liquefaction free field safety factor FS, and r(u)(S-r) is introduced, that generalizes a previous expression proposed by Chiaradonna and Flora (Geotech Lett, 2020.) for saturated soils. The new procedure has been successfully verified against some experimental data, coming from laboratory constant amplitude cyclic tests and from centrifuge tests with irregular acceleration time histories for soils having different gradings and densities.
机译:在工程实践中,砂土的液化潜力通常采用半经验、基于应力的方法进行评估,计算自由场地条件下的安全系数,定义为抗液化能力(容量)与地震需求之间的比率。通过这样做,可以获得液化可能性的估计值,但当安全系数大于1时,地震作用产生的孔隙压力增量(通常以归一化孔隙压力比r(u)的形式表示)未知。尽管可以使用复杂的数值分析来估算r(u),但如果有一个简化的程序来估算r(u),并与用于检查安全条件的基于应力的方法相一致,那将是非常有用的。本文针对饱和土和非饱和土提出了此类程序,将后者视为通过某些地基改良技术人为产生部分饱和的土壤,以提高循环强度,从而解决液化风险。介绍了无液化场地安全系数FS和r(u)(S-r)之间的简单关系,它概括了Chiaradonna和Flora(Geotech Lett,2020)之前提出的表达式对于饱和土壤。根据实验室恒幅循环试验和具有不同级配和密度土壤的不规则加速度时程离心试验得出的一些试验数据,已成功验证了新程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号