首页> 外文期刊>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. >Impact of Real-Time Therapeutic Drug Monitoring on the Prescription of Antibiotics in Burn Patients Requiring Admission to the Intensive Care Unit
【24h】

Impact of Real-Time Therapeutic Drug Monitoring on the Prescription of Antibiotics in Burn Patients Requiring Admission to the Intensive Care Unit

机译:实时治疗药物监测对需要入院的烧伤患者抗生素处方的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

As pharmacokinetics after burn trauma are difficult to predict, we conducted a 3-year prospective, monocentric, randomized, controlled trial to determine the extent of under-and overdosing of antibiotics and further evaluate the impact of systematic therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with same-day real-time dose adaptation to reach and maintain antibiotic concentrations within the therapeutic range. Forty-five consecutive burn patients treated with antibiotics were prospectively screened. Forty fulfilled the inclusion criteria; after one patient refused to participate and one withdrew consent, 19 were randomly assigned to an intervention group (patients with real-time antibiotic concentration determination and subsequent adaptations) and 19 were randomly assigned to a standard-of-care group (patients with antibiotic administration at the physician's discretion without real-time TDM). Seventy-three infection episodes were analyzed. Before the intervention, only 46/82 (56%) initial trough concentrations fell within the range. There was no difference between groups in the initial trough concentrations (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.39 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.81 to 2.39], P = 0.227) or the time to reach the target. However, thanks to real-time dose adjustments, the trough concentrations of the intervention group remained more within the predefined range (57/77 [74.0%] versus 48/85 [56.5%]; adjusted odd ratio [OR] = 2.34 [95% CI, 1.17 to 4.81], P = 0.018), more days were spent within the target range (193 days/297 days on antibiotics [65.0%] versus 171 days/311 days in antibiotics [55.0%]; adjusted OR = 1.64 [95% CI, 1.16 to 2.32], P = 0.005), and fewer results were below the target trough concentrations (25/118 [21.2%] versus 44/126 [34.9%]; adjusted OR = 0.47 [95% CI, 0.26 to 0.87], P = 0.015). No difference in infection outcomes was observed between the study groups. Systematic TDM with same-day real-time dose adaptation was effective in reaching and maintaining therapeutic antibiotic concentrations in infected burn patients, which prevented both over-and underdosing. A larger multicentric study is needed to further evaluate the impact of this strategy on infection outcomes and the emergence of antibiotic resistance during long-term burn treatment.
机译:由于烧伤后的药代动力学难以预测,我们进行了3年的前瞻性,单眼,随机,对照试验,以确定抗生素的欠和过量过量的程度,并进一步评估系统治疗药物监测(TDM)的影响 - 日期实时剂量适应,以在治疗范围内达到和维持抗生素浓度。前瞻性地筛选了用抗生素治疗的四十五次连续烧伤患者。第四十岁符合纳入标准;在拒绝参与的患者和一个撤销同意之后,将19例随机分配给干预组(实时抗生素浓度测定的患者和随后的适应)和19例被随机分配给一个护理标准组(抗生素给药患者在没有实时TDM的没有实时TDM的医生的自由裁量权。分析了七十三张感染事件。在干预之前,只有46/82(56%)的初始槽浓度在范围内下降。初始槽浓度的组之间没有差异(调节危险比= 1.39 [95%置信区间{Ci},0.81至2.39],p = 0.227)或到达目标的时间。然而,由于实时剂量调节,干预组的槽浓度在预定范围内仍然更多(57/77 [74.0%]而48/85 [56.5%];调整后的奇数比率[或] = 2.34 [95 %ci,1.17至4.81],p = 0.018),在目标范围内花费更多天(抗生素193天/ 297天[65.0%]与171天/ 311天抗生素[55.0%];调整或= 1.64 [95%CI,1.16至2.32],p = 0.005),结果较少,结果较少低于靶槽浓度(25/118 [21.2%]与44/126 [34.9%];调整或= 0.47 [95%CI, 0.26至0.87],p = 0.015)。研究组之间没有观察到感染结果的差异。具有当前实时剂量适应的系统TDM是有效的,在感染烧伤患者中达到和维持治疗性抗生素浓度,这阻止了过度和欠载。需要更大的多中心研究,以进一步评估该策略对感染结果的影响以及长期烧伤治疗期间的抗生素抗性的出现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号