首页> 外文期刊>Anticancer Research: International Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment >Brachytherapy for Buccal Cancer: From Conventional Low Dose Rate (LDR) or Mold Technique to High Dose Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT)
【24h】

Brachytherapy for Buccal Cancer: From Conventional Low Dose Rate (LDR) or Mold Technique to High Dose Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT)

机译:口腔癌的近距离放射治疗:从常规低剂量率(LDR)或模具技术到高剂量率间隙近距离放射治疗(HDR-ISBT)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background/Aim: To examine the effectiveness of newly-installed high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) for buccal cancer. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 36 patients (25 men and 11 women) with buccal cancer treated with curative brachytherapy with or without external radiotherapy with a median follow-up of 99 months. A total of 15 HDR-ISBT (median 48 Gy/8 fractions, range= 24-60 Gy) patients were compared to conventional 15 cases LDR-ISBT (70 Gy, range= 42.8-110 Gy) and 7 molds techniques (15 Gy, range= 9-74 Gy). A total of 31 patients also underwent external radiotherapy (30 Gy, range= 24-48 Gy). They comprised of 3T1, 23 T2, 8 T3, 3 T4 including 11 node positive cases. Results: HDR-ISBT provided 82% of local control rate at 5 years, whereas conventional brachytherapy showed 72% [p= 0.44; LDR-ISBT (65%), mold therapy (85.7%)]. Patients with early lesions (T1-2 or stage I-II) showed better local control rates than those with advanced lesions (T3-4 or stage III-IV). Severe late grade 3 complications developed in two patients treated with LDR-ISBT and EBRT. There is no significant difference in toxicity grade <= 2 between conventional brachytherapy (5/15= 33%) and HDR-ISBT (7/32= 32%, p= 0.92). Conclusion: HDR-ISBT achieved good and comparable local control rates to conventional brachytherapy without elevating the toxicity.
机译:背景/目的:检查新安装的高剂量率间质近距离放射治疗(HDR-ISBT)对口腔癌的有效性。患者和方法:我们回顾性地审查了36名患者(25名男子和11名女性),患有药物癌症治疗,伴有或没有外部放射治疗,中位随访99个月。与常规15例LDR-ISBT(70 GY,范围= 42.8-110Gy)和7种模具技术相比,共有15个HDR-ISBT(中位数48 Gy / 8分数,范围= 24-60倍型)患者(50 GY,范围= 42.8-110Gy)(15 Gy ,范围= 9-74 GY)。共有31名患者也接受了外部放射治疗(30 Gy,范围= 24-48倍)。它们由3T1,23 T2,8 T3,3 T4组成,包括11个节点阳性病例。结果:HDR-ISBT在5年内提供了82%的局部控制率,而常规的近距离放射治疗显示72%[P = 0.44; LDR-ISBT(65%),霉菌疗法(85.7%)]。早期病变的患者(T1-2或第I-II)显示出比具有晚期病变的局部控制率更好(T3-4或III-IV)。严重的晚期3级并发症,两种患者开发,治疗LDR-ISBT和EBRT。常规近距离放射治疗(5/15 = 33%)和HDR-ISBT之间没有显着差异<= 2(7/32 = 32%,P = 0.92)。结论:HDR-ISBT对常规近距离放射治疗的良好和可比的局部控制率而不提高毒性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号