首页> 外文期刊>Anticancer Research: International Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment >Clinical Significance of Urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator (uPA) and its Type-1 Inhibitor (PAI-1) for Metastatic Sentinel Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer
【24h】

Clinical Significance of Urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator (uPA) and its Type-1 Inhibitor (PAI-1) for Metastatic Sentinel Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer

机译:尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活剂(UPA)及其1型抑制剂(PAI-1)对乳腺癌的转移淋巴结(PAI-1)的临床意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its type-1 inhibitor (PAI-1) are key factors for tumor invasion and development of metastases in breast cancer. Prospective studies confirmed the prognostic significance of these factors for development of distant metastases. The predictive impact of uPA and PAI-1 for metastatic sentinel lymph node involvement is unclear. Patients and Methods: Between 2006 and 2008 uPA and PAI-1 were measured in 184 out of 1,035 patients for primary breast cancer. uPA and PAI-1 were analyzed with an ELISA assay. Measured concentrations were considered as negative for uPA <3 ng/ml and for PAI-1 <14 ng/ml. Results: In a retrospective analysis, 173/184 women had a negative sentinel lymph node and 111184 women had a metastatic sentinel lymph node. From the 11 women with a positive sentinel lymph node 7 had elevated values for uPA and 4 had elevated values for PAI-1. Four and 7 women were uPA- and PAI-1-negative, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for uPA were 63.3%, 50.9%, 7.6%, 95.6% and for PAI-1 36%, 52.6%, 4.7%, 92.9%. Even the combination of both uPA and PAI-1 values did not detect 3111 women with metastatic lymph node involvement. Conclusion: uPA and PAI-1 alone or in combination did not identify all patients with metastatic lymph node involvement. Thus, uPA and PAI-1 cannot be considered as predictive selection parameters to avoid sentinel lymph node biopsy in case of negative values for uPA or PAI-1.
机译:尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活剂(UPA)及其1型抑制剂(PAI-1)是肿瘤侵袭和乳腺癌转移发育的关键因素。前瞻性研究证实了这些因素对远处转移的发展的预后意义。 UPA和PAI-1对转移哨淋巴结淋巴结受累的预测影响尚不清楚。患者和方法:2006年至2008年upa和pai-1在1,035名患者中为1,035名患者的原发性乳腺癌。用ELISA测定分析UPA和PAI-1。将测量的浓度视为uPA <3ng / ml和PAI-1 <14ng / ml为阴性。结果:在回顾性分析中,173/184名女性有阴性哨淋巴结,111184名妇女进行转移哨淋巴结。从11个患有正哨淋巴结7的女性,UPA和4的升高值为PAI-1的升高值。四个和7名女性分别是upa-和pai-1阴性。 UPA的敏感性,特异性,正负预测值为63.3%,50.9%,7.6%,95.6%和PAI-1 36%,52.6%,4.7%,92.9%。甚至UPA和PAI-1值的组合甚至没有检测到3111个患有转移性淋巴结受累的妇女。结论:UPA和PAI-1单独或组合未识别所有转移性淋巴结受累的患者。因此,UPA和PAI-1不能被认为是预测选择参数,以避免在UPA或PAI-1的负值的情况下避免Sentinel淋巴结活检。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号