Techno-economic evaluations of post-combustion CO <ce:inf loc='post'>2</ce:inf> capture from sub- and super-critical circulated fluidised bed combustion (CFBC) power plants
首页> 外文期刊>Applied thermal engineering: Design, processes, equipment, economics >Techno-economic evaluations of post-combustion CO 2 capture from sub- and super-critical circulated fluidised bed combustion (CFBC) power plants
【24h】

Techno-economic evaluations of post-combustion CO 2 capture from sub- and super-critical circulated fluidised bed combustion (CFBC) power plants

机译:电子燃烧后CO 2 从子和超临界循环流化床燃烧(CFBC)发电厂捕获

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

HighlightsTechno-economic assessments of sub- and super-critical CFBC power plants with CCS.Post-combustion CO2capture by gas-liquid absorption and gas-solid adsorption.In-depth techno-economic assessment applied for CFBC power plants with CCS.Calcium looping cycle delivers lower energy and cost penalties for carbon capture.AbstractThe heat and power generation sector is facing fundamental changes for transition to a low carbon scenario due to significant environmental constraints. This paper is evaluating from techno-economic point of view the integration of post-combustion CO2capture technologies into coal-based CFBC power plants operated in sub- and super-critical steam conditions. Two post-combustion CO2capture technologies were assessed: a chemical gas-liquid absorption using alkanolamines (Methyl-DiEthanol-Amine - MDEA) and a gas-solid adsorption using calcium-based sorbent (Calcium Looping - CaL). The analysis evaluates how chemical gas-liquid absorption/gas-solid adsorption influence the techno-economic performances of CFBC power plants. As benchmark cases used to quantify the energy and cost penalties for CO2capture, the correspondent sub- and super-critical CFBC plants without CO2capture were considered. As the results show, the CaL concepts exhibits better net electrical efficiency (35% vs. 32%), higher carbon capture rate (97% vs. 90%) and improved economic indicators (e.g. 1860vs. 2552?/kW net power as specific capital investment, 34vs. 41.6?/MWh as O&M costs, 66vs. 84?/MWh as cost of electricity) compared to the MDEA cases (all these values being reported for the super-critical CFBC designs).]]>
机译:<![cdata [ 亮点 具有ccs的超关键CFBC发电厂的技术经济评估。 后 - COBBUSTION CO 2 通过气液吸收和气体固体吸附捕获。 用于CCS的CFBC发电厂的深入技术经济评估。< / ce:para> 钙循环cy CLE提供较低的能量和成本惩罚用于碳捕获。 抽象 由于显着的环境限制,热量和发电扇区面临到过渡到低碳场景的基本变化。本文从技术经济的角度评估了后燃烧CO 2 捕获技术进入基于煤的CFBC发电厂的捕获技术 - 临界蒸汽条件。两种后燃烧CO 2 捕获技术被评估:使用链烷醇胺(甲基二乙醇 - 胺 - MDEA)和气体固体吸附的化学气液吸收使用钙的吸附剂(钙环 - Cal)。分析评估了化学气液吸收/气体 - 固体吸附如何影响CFBC发电厂的技术经济性能。作为基准案例,用于量化CO 2 捕获,记者和超关键CFBC工厂没有CO 2 捕获被考虑。作为结果表明,CAL概念表现出更好的净电效率(35%对32%),较高的碳捕获率(97%与90%)和改善的经济指标(例如,1860Vs。2552?/ kW净功率。资本投资,34Vs。41.6?/ MWH作为O&M成本,66Vs。与MDEA病例相比,电力成本84?/ MWH(所有这些值都是针对超重关键的CFBC设计)。 ]]>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号