...
首页> 外文期刊>Analytica chimica acta >Comparison of three sample addition methods in competitive and sandwich colloidal gold immunochromatographic assay
【24h】

Comparison of three sample addition methods in competitive and sandwich colloidal gold immunochromatographic assay

机译:三种样品胶体金免疫色素测定中的三种样品添加方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Immunochromatographic assays (ICAs) are mainstream point-of-care diagnostic tools in disease control, food safety, and environmental monitoring. However, the important issue pertaining to the influence of sample addition methods on the detection performance of ICAs has not been addressed, and related information is still lacking. Herein, we selected the well-accepted gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) as visual labels. AuNP-based ICA was then used to explore the effects of three sample addition methods (i.e., dry, wet, and insert) on the analytical performance of ICAs by using competitive and sandwich models. Under optimized conditions, the competitive ICA with clenbuterol as an analyte showed a negligible difference (p > 0.05) in the detection performance of the three methods in ideal phosphate buffered saline solution. However, the wet method demonstrated the worst performance in pork samples (p < 0.05). The sandwich ICA strip with human chorionic gonadotropin as an analyte revealed the significantly different analytical performances of the three approaches in phosphate buffer (PB) solution and spiked serum (p < 0.05). Two independent linear correlations were observed with the increase in target concentration. However, for the wet method in the PB solution and serum, the first linear correlation was at a relatively narrow target concentration range, and the second linear correlation was at a wider concentration range compared with those for the dry and insert methods. Our findings demonstrated that sample addition methods slightly influence competitive ICAs (p > 0.05) but remarkably affect sandwich ICAs (p < 0.05). We believe that this study can further explain the differences in detection results for the same target analyte in actual ICA detection. The results may serve as a reference in the rational selection of the appropriate sample addition method for succeeding ICA works.(C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:免疫层析测定(ICAS)是疾病控制,食品安全和环境监测中的主流诊断工具。然而,尚未解决与样品加法方法对ICA的检测性能影响有关的重要问题,仍缺乏相关信息。在此,我们选择了可接受的金纳米颗粒(AUNP)作为视觉标记。然后使用基于AUNP的ICA来探讨三种样品添加方法(即,干燥,湿,涂抹)对ICA的分析性能的影响,通过使用竞争和三明治模型。在优化条件下,具有Clenbuterol作为分析物的竞争性ICA在理想的磷酸盐缓冲盐水溶液中的三种方法的检测性能下显示出可忽略的差异(P> 0.05)。然而,湿法方法在猪肉样品中表现出最糟​​糕的性能(P <0.05)。与人绒毛膜促性腺激素的三明治ICA条带作为分析物揭示了磷酸盐缓冲液(Pb)溶液和尖刺血清中三种方法的显着不同的分析性能(P <0.05)。随着目标浓度的增加,观察到两个独立的线性相关性。然而,对于PB溶液和血清中的湿法,第一线性相关位于目标浓度范围相对较窄,与干燥和插入方法相比,第二线性相关处于更宽的浓度范围。我们的研究结果表明,样品加法方法略有影响竞争ICA(P> 0.05),但显着影响三明治ICAs(P <0.05)。我们认为,该研究可以进一步解释实际ICA检测中相同目标分析物的检测结果的差异。结果可以作为合理选择合理选择适当的样品加法方法的参考。(c)2019 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号