...
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Systems >Operational forecasting of South African sugarcane production: Part 2 - System evaluation.
【24h】

Operational forecasting of South African sugarcane production: Part 2 - System evaluation.

机译:南非甘蔗生产的操作预测:第2部分-系统评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The performance of a model-based crop forecasting system is assessed in this paper. The operational error associated with a forecast originates from two independent sources. First, the system error reflects the system's ability to match yields simulated from historic data to actual yields. The system error is due to factors such as model and data inaccuracies, incorrect aggregation assumptions and the system's inability to reflect all the compelling factors, like pest and diseases, climatic disasters and suboptimal crop management. Second, the climate error reflects inaccuracies of the operational yield forecasts associated with the assumed future climate. The purpose of the study was to assess the performance of a system to forecast sugarcane yields by quantifying the accuracy of (1) estimates based on complete sets of actual weather data and (2) operational system forecasts with incomplete sets of actual weather data. Estimates and forecasts were compared to actual yields recorded from 1980 to 2004. Industry production data from 1980 to 2002, corrected for various time trends, were used to calculate the system error for mills and the industry. The skill of estimation was calculated by comparing the size of the system error with the observed seasonal variation. On an industry scale, estimates captured 57% of inter-annual variability. Production at most mills was also simulated well, with some exceptions in irrigated areas. Operational forecasts issued between January and April for the industry between 1998 and 2004 had an average forecast error of 4.0%, which is 2.2% lower than the equivalent mill committee forecasts. The study provides ample evidence that industry stakeholders could use information from this system to enhance their management of sugarcane production.
机译:本文评估了基于模型的作物预报系统的性能。与预测相关的操作错误来自两个独立的来源。首先,系统误差反映了系统将历史数据模拟的收益与实际收益进行匹配的能力。系统错误是由于诸如模型和数据不正确,不正确的聚合假设以及系统无法反映所有令人信服的因素(例如病虫害,气候灾难和农作物管理不佳)等因素引起的。第二,气候误差反映了与假定的未来气候相关的运营产量预测的不准确性。该研究的目的是通过量化(1)基于完整的实际天气数据集和(2)具有不完整的实际天气数据集的操作系统预测的准确性来评估预测甘蔗产量的系统的性能。将估计和预测与1980年至2004年记录的实际产量进行了比较。1980年至2002年的行业生产数据(针对各种时间趋势进行了校正)用于计算工厂和行业的系统误差。通过将系统误差的大小与观察到的季节性变化进行比较,可以计算出估算技巧。在行业规模上,估计值捕获了年际变化的57%。大多数工厂的生产也得到了很好的模拟,但在灌溉地区有一些例外。 1998年至2004年1月至4月发布的对该行业的运营预测的平均预测误差为4.0%,比同等的轧机委员会的预测低2.2%。该研究提供了充足的证据,表明行业利益相关者可以使用该系统中的信息来增强对甘蔗生产的管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号