首页> 外文期刊>American journal of public health >When health insurance is not a factor: National comparison of homeless and nonhomeless US veterans who use veterans affairs emergency departments
【24h】

When health insurance is not a factor: National comparison of homeless and nonhomeless US veterans who use veterans affairs emergency departments

机译:健康保险不是一个因素:使用退伍军人事务急诊部门的无家可归和非无声的美国退伍军人的全国比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives. We examined the proportion of homeless veterans among users of Veterans Affairs (VA) emergency departments (EDs) and compared sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of homeless and nonhomeless VA emergency department users nationally. Methods. We used national VA administrative data from fiscal year 2010 for a cross-sectional study comparing homeless (n = 64 091) and nonhomeless (n = 866 621) ED users on sociodemographics, medical and psychiatric diagnoses, and other clinical characteristics. Results. Homeless veterans had 4 times the odds of using EDs than nonhomeless veterans. Multivariate analyses found few differences between homeless and nonhomeless ED users on the medical conditions examined, but homeless ED users were more likely to have been diagnosed with a drug use disorder (odds ratio [OR] = 4.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.97, 4.27), alcohol use disorder (OR = 3.67; 95% CI = 3.55, 3.79), or schizophrenia (OR = 3.44; 95% CI = 3.25, 3.64) in the past year. Conclusions. In a national integrated health care system with no specific requirements for health insurance, the major differences found between homeless and nonhomeless ED users were high rates of psychiatric and substance abuse diagnoses. EDs may be an important location for specialized homeless outreach (or "in" reach) services to address mental health and addictive disorders.
机译:目标。我们在退伍军人事务(VA)急诊部门(EDS)的用户中审查了无家可归者退伍军人的比例,并比较了国内无家可归和无家可归者的社会渗目和临床特征。方法。我们在2010年度2010年的国家VA行政数据进行了比较无家可归(n = 64 091)和非无声(n = 866 621)ED用户对社会碘目,医疗和精神病诊断等临床特征的横断面研究。结果。无家可归的退伍军人使用EDS的可能性比无声退伍军人的可能性4倍。多变量分析发现,无家可归者和非无声的ED用户在检查的医疗条件下的差异,但无家可归的用户更有可能被诊断出患有药物使用障碍(差距[或] = 4.12; 95%置信区间[CI] = 3.97,4.27),酒精使用障碍(或= 3.67; 95%CI = 3.55,3.79)或精神分裂症(或= 3.44; 95%CI = 3.25,3.64)。结论。在全国综合医疗保健系统中,没有对健康保险的具体要求,无家可归和非无声ED用户之间的主要差异是精神审查和药物滥用诊断的高差异。 EDS可能是专门的无家可归者外展(或“在”到达)服务中的重要地点,以解决心理健康和令人上瘾的障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号