首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Public Hygiene >When Health Insurance Is Not a Factor: National Comparison of Homeless and Nonhomeless US Veterans Who Use Veterans Affairs Emergency Departments
【2h】

When Health Insurance Is Not a Factor: National Comparison of Homeless and Nonhomeless US Veterans Who Use Veterans Affairs Emergency Departments

机译:当健康保险不是一个因素时:使用退伍军人事务急诊科的美国无家可归者和非无家可归者的全国比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives. We examined the proportion of homeless veterans among users of Veterans Affairs (VA) emergency departments (EDs) and compared sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of homeless and nonhomeless VA emergency department users nationally.Methods. We used national VA administrative data from fiscal year 2010 for a cross-sectional study comparing homeless (n = 64 091) and nonhomeless (n = 866 621) ED users on sociodemographics, medical and psychiatric diagnoses, and other clinical characteristics.Results. Homeless veterans had 4 times the odds of using EDs than nonhomeless veterans. Multivariate analyses found few differences between homeless and nonhomeless ED users on the medical conditions examined, but homeless ED users were more likely to have been diagnosed with a drug use disorder (odds ratio [OR] = 4.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.97, 4.27), alcohol use disorder (OR = 3.67; 95% CI = 3.55, 3.79), or schizophrenia (OR = 3.44; 95% CI = 3.25, 3.64) in the past year.Conclusions. In a national integrated health care system with no specific requirements for health insurance, the major differences found between homeless and nonhomeless ED users were high rates of psychiatric and substance abuse diagnoses. EDs may be an important location for specialized homeless outreach (or “in” reach) services to address mental health and addictive disorders.
机译:目标。我们调查了退伍军人事务(VA)急诊科(ED)使用者中无家可归退伍军人的比例,并比较了全国无家可归和非无家可归VA急诊科使用者的社会人口统计学和临床​​特征。我们使用2010财年的国家VA行政数据进行了横断面研究,比较了社会人口统计学,医学和精神病学诊断以及其他临床特征的无家可归者(n = 64 091)和非无家可归者(n = 866 621)ED用户。无家可归的退伍军人使用ED的几率是非无家可归的退伍军人的4倍。多变量分析发现,在所检查的医疗状况下,无家可归和非无家可归的ED使用者之间几乎没有差异,但是无家可归的ED使用者更有可能被诊断出患有药物使用障碍(赔率[OR] = 4.12; 95%置信区间[CI] = 3.97、4.27),酒精使用障碍(OR = 3.67; 95%CI = 3.55,3.79)或精神分裂症(OR = 3.44; 95%CI = 3.25,3.64)。在没有对医疗保险有具体要求的国家综合医疗体系中,无家可归和非无家可归的急诊科使用者之间发现的主要差异是精神病和药物滥用诊断的比率很高。急诊科可能是专门的无家可归者外展(或“触及”范围内)服务的重要场所,以解决心理健康和成瘾性疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号