...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Physiology >Impaired fasting glucose with or without impaired glucose tolerance: progressive or parallel states of prediabetes?
【24h】

Impaired fasting glucose with or without impaired glucose tolerance: progressive or parallel states of prediabetes?

机译:有或没有受损的葡萄糖耐受性的空腹葡萄糖受损:Prediapetes的渐进或平行状态?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

First published June 3, 2008; doi:10.1152/ajpendo.90354.2008.-Our objective was to determine whether defects underlying impaired fasting glucose (EFG) are maintained and additive when combined with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (representing a progressive form of prediabetes) or are distinct in IFG/IGT (reflecting a parallel form of prediabetes). Volunteers with IFG (n = 10), IFG/IGT (n = 14), or normal glucose tolerance (NGT; n = 15) were matched for demographics and anthropometry. Insulin secretion was assessed using the glucose step-up protocol and insulin action through the use of a two-stage hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp with infusion of [6,6-2H2]glucose. Modeling of insulin secretory parameters revealed similar basal (<&b) but diminished dynamic (4>d) components in both IFG and IFG/IGT (P = 0.05 vs. NGT for both). Basal glucose rate of appearance (Ra) was higher in IFG compared with NGT (P < 0.01) and also, surprisingly, with IFG/IGT (P < 0.04). Moreover, glucose Ra suppressed more during the low-dose insulin clamp in IFG (P < 0.01 vs. NGT, P = 0.08 vs. IFG/IGT). Insulin-stimulated glucose uptake [glucose rate of disappearance (R<0] was similar in IFG, IFG/IGT, and NGT throughout the clamp. We conclude that nuances of beta-cell dysfunction observed in IFG were also noted in IFG/IGT. A trend for additional insulin secretory defects was observed in IFG/ IGT, possibly suggesting progression in beta-cell failure in this group. In contrast, basal glucose Ra and its suppressability with insulin were higher in IFG, but not IFG/IGT, compared with NGT. Together, these data indicate that IFG/IGT may be a distinct prediabetic syndrome rather than progression from IFG.
机译:2008年6月3日第一次出版; DOI:10.1152 / ajpendo.90354.2008.-我们的目的是确定在与葡萄糖耐量(IGT)(代表Prediapetes的进步形式)组合或在IFG中与IFG的缺陷(IGT)组合或在IFG中不同的情况下保持缺陷的缺陷IGT(反射PrediaBet的平行形式)。具有IFG(n = 10),IFG / IGT(n = 14)或正常葡萄糖耐量(NGT; n = 15)的志愿者与人称和人类测量法相匹配。通过使用具有[6,6-2H2]葡萄糖的输注的两阶段高胰岛素血糖性外血糖钳,使用葡萄糖升压方案和胰岛素作用评估胰岛素分泌。胰岛素分泌参数的建模显示,IFG和IFG / IGT中的相似基础(<&B),但在IFG / IGT中的动态(4> D)组分(P = 0.05对NGT)。与NGT(P <0.01)相比,IFG(P <0.01)的基础葡萄糖率(RA)较高,并且令人惊讶的是,IFG / IGT(P <0.04)。此外,在IFG的低剂量胰岛素夹持过程中,葡萄糖RA抑制了更多(P <0.01 Vt,P = 0.08 Vs.IFG / IGT)。胰岛素刺激的葡萄糖摄取[葡萄糖失踪速率(R <0]在整个夹具中的IFG,IFG / IGT和NGT类似。我们得出结论,IFG / IGT中观察到IFG中观察到的β细胞功能障碍的细微差异。在IFG / IGT中观察到额外的胰岛素分泌缺陷的趋势,可能表明该组的β细胞衰竭的进展。相比之下,IFG的基础葡萄糖Ra及其与胰岛素的抑制性较高,而不是IFG / IGT,与NGT。这些数据表明IFG / IGT可以是不同的预测综合征而不是来自IFG的进展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号