...
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Water Management >Comparative assessment of five methods of determining sap flow in peach trees
【24h】

Comparative assessment of five methods of determining sap flow in peach trees

机译:桃树中五种液流测定方法的比较评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Five different methods of determining sap flow (SF), three based on heat pulse (compensation heat pulse, New Zealand--cHP-NZ; compensation heat pulse, Greenspan/Australia--cHP-G (South oriented), and cHP-G-EW (East and West oriented, average); non-compensation heat pulse, Ariel/Israel--ncHP), one based on stem heat balance (Dynamax/USA--SHB), and another based on heat dissipation (Granier/France--HD) were compared in an experiment performed on peach trees in Northeast Spain. Two irrigation treatments (drip-irrigated) were applied: a control and a stress treatment, the latter consisting of withholding water from day 190 to 199. Between 1 and 3 different systems were installed in some trees of both, the control and stress treatments. All the techniques reflected the evolution of water stress in the stressed trees with a very similar tendency and in agreement with the evolution of predawn water potential (.p). .p correlated well with sap flow (SF) determined with all the systems (r po >0.65) in the stress treatment, indicating that all the SF techniques detected changes in tree water status. The cHP-NZ system was the first to detect a SF reduction through the outer xylem vessels, as a response to water withholding. In control trees, daily SF rates provided by the three heat pulse and heat balance methods were well correlated with ETo and somewhat less with global radiation; all regressions improved on an hourly basis. Daily pattern and magnitude of mean SF rates monitored by the three heat pulse systems were quite similar in control trees. This was reflected by high regression coefficients when compared with each other. Higher SF rates recorded by ncHP methods in comparison with cHP-G and cHP-NZ might be attributed to technical limitations and to different sensor orientation. In an accompanying experiment, substantial differences between East and West location of the cHP-G sensors were observed, but when taking the mean value of those daily SF rates, differences between ncHP and cHP-G-EW were lower. Mean monthly crop coefficients, calculated by using SF data computed with ncHP method and soil evaporation as determined with microlysimeters, were 0.64 in July and 0.67 in August. SF systems can be used to detect plant water stress related to control, and might be useful for irrigation scheduling based on plant water status. The SF techniques analysed showed potential to better determine actual plant water necessities than other traditional methods, but a preceding calibration is needed.
机译:有五种不同的确定液流的方法,三种基于热脉冲(补偿热脉冲,新西兰-cHP-NZ;补偿热脉冲,格林斯潘/澳大利亚-cHP-G(南向)和cHP-G -EW(东西方向,平均);无补偿热脉冲,Ariel /以色列-ncHP,一个基于茎热平衡(Dynamax /美国-SHB),另一个基于散热(Granier /法国) -HD)在西班牙东北的桃树上进行的实验中进行了比较。进行了两种灌溉处理(滴灌):一种是对照处理,另一种是压力处理,后者从190天到199天止水。在一些树木中分别安装了1-3种不同的系统,即对照处理和压力处理。所有技术均以相似的趋势反映了受压树木中水分胁迫的演变,并且与黎明前的水势(.p)的演变一致。 .p与压力处理中所有系统确定的树液流量(SF> 0.65)很好地相关,表明所有SF技术都检测到树木水状态的变化。 cHP-NZ系统是第一个通过外部木质部容器检测到SF减少的系统,以响应水的保留。在对照树中,三种热脉冲和热平衡方法提供的每日SF率与ETo相关性很好,而与整体辐射的相关性则较小。所有回归每小时都会改善。在对照树中,由三个热脉冲系统监测的日模式和平均SF率的幅度非常相似。相互比较时,高回归系数反映了这一点。与cHP-G和cHP-NZ相比,通过ncHP方法记录的较高SF率可能归因于技术限制和不同的传感器方向。在伴随的实验中,观察到cHP-G传感器的东西位置之间存在实质性差异,但是以这些每日SF率的平均值为单位,ncHP和cHP-G-EW的差异较小。使用ncHP方法计算的SF数据和用微量测微计确定的土壤蒸发量计算得出的平均月度作物系数在7月为0.64,8月为0.67。 SF系统可用于检测与控制相关的植物水分胁迫,对于基于植物水分状况的灌溉计划可能有用。分析的SF技术显示出比其他传统方法更好地确定实际植物需水量的潜力,但需要事先进行校准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号