...
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Water Management >Artificial neural network and time series models for predicting soil salt and water content. (Special Issue: Salinity management in China.)
【24h】

Artificial neural network and time series models for predicting soil salt and water content. (Special Issue: Salinity management in China.)

机译:人工神经网络和时间序列模型,用于预测土壤盐分和水分含量。 (特刊:中国的盐度管理。)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Volumetric water content of a silt loam soil (fluvo-aquic soil) in North China Plain was measured in situ by L-520 neutron probe (made in China) at three depths in the crop rootzone during a lysimeter experiment from 2001 to 2006. The electrical conductivity of the soil water (ECsw) was measured by salinity sensors buried in the soil during the same period at 10, 20, 45 and 70 cm depth below soil surface. These data were used to test two mathematical procedures to predict water content and soil water salinity at depths of interest: all the available data were divided into training and testing datasets, then back propagation neural networks (BPNNs) were optimized by sensitivity analysis to minimizing the performance error, and then were finally used to predict soil water and ECsw. In order to meet with the prerequisite of autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model, firstly, original soil water content and ECsw time series were likewise transformed to obtain stationary series. Subsequently, the transformed time series were used to conduct analysis in frequency domain to obtain the parameters of the ARIMA models for the purposes of using the ARIMA model to predict soil water content and ECsw. Based on the statistical parameters used to assess model performance, the BPNN model performed better in predicting the average water content than the ARIMA model: coefficient of determination (R2)=0.8987, sum of squares error (SSE)=0.000009, and mean absolute error (MAE)=0.000967 for BPNN as compared to R2=0.8867, SSE=0.000043, MAE=0.002211 for ARIMA. The BPNN model also performed better than the ARIMA model in predicting average ECsw of soil profile. However, the ARIMA model performed better than the BPNN models in predicting soil water content at the depth of 20 cm and ECsw at the depth of 10 cm below soil surface. Overall, the model developed by BPNN network showed its advantage of less parameter input, nonlinearity, simple model structure and good prediction of soil ECsw and water content, and it gave an alternative method in forecasting soil water and salt dynamics to those based on deterministic models based on Richards' equation and Darcy's law provided climatic, cropping patterns, salinity of the irrigation water and irrigation management are very similar from one year to the next.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.02.011
机译:在2001年至2006年的溶渗仪实验中,使用L-520中子探针(中国制造)在作物根区的三个深度现场测量了华北平原粉质壤土(潮土)的体积含水量。通过埋入土壤中的盐度传感器,在同一时期内,在土壤表面以下10、20、45和70 cm的深度测量土壤水的电导率(EC sw )。这些数据用于测试两个数学程序,以预测感兴趣深度的水含量和土壤盐分:将所有可用数据分为训练和测试数据集,然后通过敏感性分析优化反向传播神经网络(BPNN),以最大程度地减少性能误差,然后最终用于预测土壤水分和EC sw 。为了满足自回归综合移动平均(ARIMA)模型的先决条件,首先,将原始土壤含水量和EC sw 时间序列进行同样的变换,得到平稳序列。随后,将变换后的时间序列用于频域分析,以获取ARIMA模型的参数,以利用ARIMA模型预测土壤含水量和EC sw 。根据用于评估模型性能的统计参数,BPNN模型在预测平均含水量方面比ARIMA模型更好:确定系数( R 2 )= 0.8987 ,与 R 2 = 0.8867,SSE = 0.000043,MAE =相比,BPNN的平方和误差(SSE)= 0.000009,平均绝对误差(MAE)= 0.000967 ARIMA为0.002211。在预测土壤剖面平均EC sw 方面,BPNN模型也比ARIMA模型表现更好。但是,ARIMA模型在预测土壤表层以下20 cm处的土壤含水量和EC sw 在土壤表层以下10 cm处的预测方面表现优于BPNN模型。总体而言,BPNN网络开发的模型具有参数输入少,非线性,模型结构简单,对土壤EC sw 和含水量的良好预测的优点,为预测土壤水分和水分提供了一种替代方法。与基于理查兹方程和达西定律的确定性模型的盐动态相比,从一年到下一年的气候,种植模式,灌溉水的盐度和灌溉管理非常相似。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi .org / 10.1016 / j.agwat.2010.02.011

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号