...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Horticulturae >Investigating the efficacy of white light-emitting diodes at regulating flowering of photoperiodic ornamental crops
【24h】

Investigating the efficacy of white light-emitting diodes at regulating flowering of photoperiodic ornamental crops

机译:调查白光二极管在光周期观赏作物的调节下的疗效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Under natural short days (SDs), low-intensity lighting during the middle of a night (night interruption, Nl) can control flowering of daylength-sensitive ornamentals. Red (R, 600-700 nm) and far-red (FR, 700-800 nm) radiation is primarily absorbed byphytochromes that mediate flowering, whereas blue (B, 400-500 nm) radiation typically has less photoperiodic relevance, at least at a low intensity. White (W) light-emitting diodes (LEDs) emit photons over a broad spectrum; however to our knowledge, their efficacy at regulating flowering has not been published. We investigated whether white LEDs controlled flowering of five long-day plants [calibrachoa (Calibrachoa x hybrida), coreopsis (Coreopsis grandiflora), petunia (Petunia x hybrida), rudbeckia (Rudbeckia hirta), and snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus)] and two SD plants [chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum x morifolium) and marigold (Tagetes erecta)]. Plants were grown in a greenhouse at 20°C under 9-h SDs with or without 4-h NIs from R, B+R, cool-W, warm-W, or R+W+FR LEDs. Irradiance at plant canopy was adjusted to approximately 2 umol nr2 s1 between 400 and 800 nm. Compared with SD, all NIs similarly promoted flowering of calibrachoa and rudbeckia; however, only R+W+FR promoted flowering of snapdragon. NIs without FR radiation (i.e., R, B+R, cool-W, and warm-W) accelerated flowering of coreopsis and petunia, but flowering under R+W+FR was 11-16% earlier than under the other NIs. R+W+FR was less effective than the other NIs at inhibiting flowering of chrysanthemum and marigold. Cool-W and warm-W had similar effects on flowering and development of all crops. Plant height of calibrachoa, coreopsis, and marigold at flowering was greatest under R+W+FR; however, stem length of the other crops was similar under all NIs. We conclude that W LEDs inhibited flowering of SD plants and were as effective as R or R+W+FR radiation at promoting flowering of some, but not all, long-day plants.
机译:在自然的短时间(SDS)下,在夜晚的中间(夜间中断,NL)的低强度照明可以控制日间长敏感的开花。红色(R,600-700nm)和远红色(FR,700-800nm)辐射主要被介导开花的字母复制,而蓝色(B,400-500nm)辐射通常具有较小的光周期相关性,至少在低强度。白色(W)发光二极管(LED)在广谱上发射光子;然而,迄今为止,他们对调节开花的疗效尚未出版。我们调查了白色LED是否控制了五个漫长的植物(Calibrachoa(Calibrachoa X Hybrida),黑人(Coreopsis Grandiflora),芭蕾尼亚(Petonia X Hybrida),鲁贝克(Rudbeckia Hirta)和Scandragon(antirrhinummumus)]和两个SD植物[菊花(菊花X Morifolium)和万寿菊(Tagetes2erecta)]。植物在20℃下在20℃下在9-H SDS下的温室中生长,具有来自R,B + R,COOL-W,WEAL-W或R + W + F + FR LED的4-H NIS。将植物冠层的辐照度调节至400至800nm之间的大约2倍NR2 S1。与SD相比,所有NIS都同样促进了Calibrachoa和Rudbeckia的开花;但是,只有R + W + FR促进了Snapdragon的开花。没有FR辐射的NIS(即,R,B + R,COOL-W和WEAL-W)加速了Coreopsis和Petunia的开花,但在R + W + FR下的开花比其他NIS在其他NIS下降11-16%。 R + W + FR比抑制菊花和万寿菊开花的其他NIS效果较小。 COOL-W和WEAL-W对所有作物的开花和开发具有类似的影响。 Calibrachoa,Coreopsis和Flowering的万寿菊的植物高度在R + W + FR下最大。然而,在所有NIS下,其他作物的茎长度相似。我们得出结论,W LED抑制了SD植物的开花,在促进某些,但不是全部,长日植物的开花时,如R或R + W + FR辐射。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号