首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesiology >Hamilton Acute Pain Service Safety Study Using Root Cause Analysis to Reduce the Incidence of Adverse Events
【24h】

Hamilton Acute Pain Service Safety Study Using Root Cause Analysis to Reduce the Incidence of Adverse Events

机译:汉密尔顿急性疼痛服务安全性研究,使用根本原因分析来减少不良事件的发生

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Although intravenous patient-controlled analgesia opioids and epidural analgesia offer improved analgesia for postoperative patients treated on an acute pain service, these modalities also expose patients to some risk of serious morbidity and even mortality. Root cause analysis, a process for identifying the causal factor(s) that underlie an adverse event, has the potential to identify and address system issues and thereby decrease the chance of recurrence of these complications.Methods: This study was designed to compare the incidence of adverse events on an acute pain service in three hospitals, before and after the introduction of a formal root cause analysis process. The "before" cohort included all patients with pain from February 2002 to July 2007. The "after" cohort included all patients with pain from January 2009 to December 2009. Results: A total of 35,384 patients were tracked over the 7 yr of this study. The after cohort showed significant reductions in the overall event rate (1.47 vs. 2.35% or 1 in 68 vs. 1 in 42, the rate of respiratory depression (0.41 vs. 0.71%), the rate of severe hypotension (0.78 vs. 1.34%), and the rate of patient-controlled analgesia pump programming errors (0.0 vs. 0.08%). Associated with these results, the incidence of severe pain increased from 6.5 to 10.5%. To achieve these results, 26 unique recommendations were made of which 23 being completed, 1 in progress, and 2 not completed. Conclusions: Formal root cause analysis was associated with an improvement in the safety of patients on a pain service. The process was effective in giving credibility to recommendations, but addressing all the action plans proved difficult with available resources.
机译:背景:尽管静脉内自控镇痛阿片类药物和硬膜外镇痛为接受急性疼痛治疗的术后患者提供了改善的镇痛效果,但这些方式也使患者面临严重发病甚至死亡的风险。根本原因分析是一种确定不良事件背后的因果关系的过程,具有识别和解决系统问题的潜力,从而减少了这些并发症的复发机会。方法:本研究旨在比较发生率引入正式的根本原因分析过程之前和之后,三家医院对急性疼痛服务的不良反应的评估。 “之前”队列包括2002年2月至2007年7月的所有疼痛患者。“之后”队列包括2009年1月至2009年12月的所有疼痛患者。结果:在本研究的7年中,共追踪了35384名患者。之后的队列显示总体事件发生率显着降低(1.47 vs. 2.35%或68分之一vs. 42分之一),呼吸抑制的发生率(0.41 vs. 0.71%),严重低血压发生率(0.78 vs. 1.34) %),以及患者控制的镇痛泵编程错误发生率(0.0 vs. 0.08%),与这些结果相关,严重疼痛的发生率从6.5增加到10.5%。为达到这些结果,提出了26条独特的建议结论:正式的根本原因分析与改善疼痛治疗患者的安全性有关,该过程有效地提高了建议的可信度,但解决了所有措施,其中23项已完成,1项正在进行,2项尚未完成。可用资源证明计划很困难。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号