首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesiology >Lack of analgesia by oral standardized cannabis extract on acute inflammatory pain and hyperalgesia in volunteers.
【24h】

Lack of analgesia by oral standardized cannabis extract on acute inflammatory pain and hyperalgesia in volunteers.

机译:口服标准化大麻提取物对志愿者的急性炎症性疼痛和痛觉过敏缺乏镇痛作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Cannabinoid-induced analgesia was shown in animal studies of acute inflammatory and neuropathic pain. In humans, controlled clinical trials with Delta-tetrahydrocannabinol or other cannabinoids demonstrated analgesic efficacy in chronic pain syndromes, whereas the data in acute pain were less conclusive. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of oral cannabis extract in two different human models of acute inflammatory pain and hyperalgesia. METHODS: The authors conducted a double-blind, crossover study in 18 healthy female volunteers. Capsules containing Delta-tetrahydrocannabinol-standardized cannabis extract or active placebo were orally administered. A circular sunburn spot was induced at one upper leg. Heat and electrical pain thresholds were determined at the erythema, the area of secondary hyperalgesia, and the contralateral leg. Intradermal capsaicin-evoked pain and areas of flare and secondary hyperalgesia were measured. Primary outcome parameters were heat pain thresholds in the sunburn erythema and the capsaicin-evoked area of secondary hyperalgesia. Secondary measures were electrical pain thresholds, sunburn-induced secondary hyperalgesia, and capsaicin-induced pain. RESULTS: Cannabis extract did not affect heat pain thresholds in the sunburn model. Electrical thresholds (250 Hz) were significantly lower compared with baseline and placebo. In the capsaicin model, the area of secondary hyperalgesia, flare, and spontaneous pain were not altered. CONCLUSION: To conclude, no analgesic or antihyperalgesic activity of cannabis extract was found in the experiments. Moreover, the results even point to the development of a hyperalgesic state under cannabinoids. Together with previous data, the current results suggest that cannabinoids are not effective analgesics for the treatment of acute nociceptive pain in humans.
机译:背景:在急性炎症和神经性疼痛的动物研究中显示了大麻素诱导的镇痛作用。在人类中,使用Delta-tetrahydrocannabinol或其他大麻素的对照临床试验证明了对慢性疼痛综合征的镇痛效果,而对急性疼痛的数据尚无定论。因此,本研究的目的是研究口服大麻提取物在两种急性炎症性疼痛和痛觉过敏的不同人类模型中的作用。方法:作者对18位健康的女性志愿者进行了双盲,交叉研究。口服含Delta-四氢大麻酚标准化大麻提取物或活性安慰剂的胶囊。在一个大腿上引起了一个圆形的晒斑。确定红斑,继发性痛觉过敏区域和对侧腿的热和电痛阈值。测量了皮内辣椒素引起的疼痛,耀斑面积和继发性痛觉过敏。主要结局参数为晒斑红斑和辣椒素诱发的继发性痛觉过敏区域的热痛阈值。次要措施是电痛阈值,晒伤引起的继发性痛觉过敏和辣椒素引起的疼痛。结果:大麻提取物未影响晒伤模型中的热痛阈值。与基线和安慰剂相比,电阈值(250 Hz)明显较低。在辣椒素模型中,继发性痛觉过敏,耀斑和自发性疼痛的区域没有改变。结论:结论是,在实验中未发现大麻提取物的镇痛或抗痛觉过敏活性。而且,结果甚至指向在大麻素下出现痛觉过敏状态。与以前的数据一起,目前的结果表明,大麻素不是用于治疗人类急性伤害性疼痛的有效止痛药。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号