【24h】

In reply

机译:回复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We would like to thank Drs. Youngblood and Harbott for their interest in our article1 and for their valuable comments. In their letter, they voiced concerns about the methodology and interpretation of our results. At first, we have to mention the issue on the discrepancy in postoperative fentanyl consumption between current study and our historic control2 because Drs. Youngblood and Harbott believe that inconsistency in opioid consumption is one of the important evidences of withdrawal from remifentanil. As we had briefly described in the method sections of both studies, the surgical procedures were different from each other; the one in the former study was open ureteroneocystostomy via a 4-5 cm of Pfannenstiel incision (open Cohen technique), whereas the one in the current study was laparoscopic Cohen surgery under pneumove-sicum.
机译:我们要感谢博士。 Youngblood和Harbott对我们的文章1感兴趣并提出了宝贵的意见。他们在信中对我们的研究方法和结果解释表示关注。首先,我们必须提到关于当前研究与我们的历史对照之间的术后芬太尼消耗量差异的问题2,因为Drs。 Youngblood和Harbott认为,阿片类药物的摄入不一致是瑞芬太尼停用的重要证据之一。正如我们在两项研究的方法部分中所简要描述的那样,外科手术程序互不相同。前一项研究中的一项是通过4-5 cm的Pfannenstiel切口进行开放式输尿管膀胱造瘘术(开放式Cohen技术),而本项研究中的一项是在肺气肿下进行腹腔镜Cohen手术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号