首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesiology >Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients.
【24h】

Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients.

机译:麻醉患者在模拟困难气道情况下喉罩至尊与i-gel的交叉比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The single-use supraglottic airway devices LMA-Supreme (LMA-S; Laryngeal Mask Company, Henley-on-Thames, United Kingdom) and i-gel (Intersurgical Ltd, Wokingham, Berkshire, United Kingdom) have a second tube for gastric tube insertion. Only the LMA-S has an inflatable cuff. They have the same clinical indications and might be useful for difficult airway management. This prospective, crossover, randomized controlled trial was performed in a simulated difficult airway scenario using an extrication collar limiting mouth opening and neck movement. METHODS: Sixty patients were included. Both devices were placed in random order in each patient. Primary outcome was overall success rate. Other measurements were time to successful ventilation, airway leak pressure, fiberoptic glottic view, and adverse events. RESULTS: Success rate for the LMA-S was 95% versus 93% for the i-gel (P = 1.000). LMA-S needed shorter insertion time (34 +/- 12 s vs. 42 +/- 23 s, P = 0.024). Tidal volumes and airway leak pressure were similar (LMA-S 26 +/- 8 cm H20; i-gel 27 +/- 9 cm H20; P = 0.441). Fiberoptic view through the i-gel showed less epiglottic downfolding. Overall agreement in insertion outcome was 54 (successes) and 1 (failure) or 55 (92%) of 60 patients. The difference in success rate was 1.7% (95% CI -11.3% to 7.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Both airway devices had similar insertion success and clinical performance in the simulated difficult airway situation. The authors found less epiglottic downfolding and better fiberoptic view but longer insertion time with the i-gel. Our study shows that both devices are feasible for emergency airway management in patients with reduced neck movement and limited mouth opening.
机译:背景:一次性使用的声门上气道设备LMA-Supreme(LMA-S;英国泰晤士河畔亨利的喉罩公司)和i-gel(Intersurgical Ltd,英国伯克郡沃金厄姆)有第二根导管胃管插入。只有LMA-S带有充气袖带。它们具有相同的临床适应症,可能对困难的气道管理有用。这项前瞻性,交叉,随机对照试验是在模拟困难的气道情况下进行的,使用的是放松的项圈,限制了张口和颈部运动。方法:纳入60例患者。两种设备均以随机顺序放置在每个患者中。主要结果是总体成功率。其他测量指标包括成功通气时间,气道渗漏压力,纤维状声门视图和不良事件。结果:LMA-S的成功率为95%,而i-gel的成功率为93%(P = 1.000)。 LMA-S需要更短的插入时间(34 +/- 12 s和42 +/- 23 s,P = 0.024)。潮气量和气道泄漏压力相似(LMA-S 26 +/- 8 cm H20; i-gel 27 +/- 9 cm H20; P = 0.441)。通过i-gel的光纤视图显示会厌向下折叠较少。插入结果的总体一致性为54(成功)和1(失败),或60名患者中的55(92%)。成功率差异为1.7%(95%CI -11.3%至7.6%)。结论:在模拟困难气道情况下,两种气道装置的插入成功率和临床表现均相似。作者发现,会厌向下折叠较少,纤维视野更好,但使用i-gel的插入时间更长。我们的研究表明,对于颈部运动减少和张口受限的患者,两种设备均可用于紧急气道管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号