...
首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesiology >Lumbar sympathetic blockade in children with complex regional pain syndromes: a double blind placebo-controlled crossover trial.
【24h】

Lumbar sympathetic blockade in children with complex regional pain syndromes: a double blind placebo-controlled crossover trial.

机译:复杂区域性疼痛综合征患儿的腰椎交感神经阻滞:一项双盲安慰剂对照的交叉试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Sympathetic blockade is used in the management of complex regional pain syndromes in children, but there are no data on the efficacy or mechanism(s) by which it produces pain relief. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of lidocaine administered by lumbar sympathetic to IV route. METHODS: Under general anesthesia, children with unilateral lower limb complex regional pain syndromes received catheters along the lumbar sympathetic chain. In a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover design, patients received IV lidocaine and lumbar sympathetic saline or lumbar sympathetic lidocaine and IV saline. Spontaneous and evoked pain ratings and sensory thresholds were assessed before and after these two lidocaine/saline doses and between routes of lumbar sympathetic blockade and IV. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients, ages 10-18 yr, were enrolled. There was evidence for reduction of mean pain intensity of allodynia to brush (mean -1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.5 to -0.3) and to pinprick temporal summation (mean -1.3, 95% CI -2.5 to -0.2) with lidocaine treatment via the lumbar sympathetic blockade compared to IV route. Lumbar sympathetic blockade also produced significant reduction in pain intensity compared to pretreatment values of allodynia to brush, pinprick and pinprick temporal summation and verbal pain scores. IV lidocaine did not produce significant changes in spontaneous and evoked pain intensity measurements compared to pretreatment values. There were no carryover effects as assessed by route-by-period interaction. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, the results provide some direct evidence that a component of pain may be mediated by abnormal sympathetic efferent activity.
机译:背景:交感神经阻滞用于治疗儿童复杂的局部疼痛综合症,但尚无有关缓解疼痛的功效或机制的数据。这项研究的目的是比较腰椎交感静脉注射利多卡因与静脉内给药的疗效。方法:在全身麻醉下,单侧下肢复杂区域性疼痛综合征的患儿沿腰交感神经链接受导管。在双盲安慰剂对照的交叉设计中,患者接受静脉注射利多卡因和腰椎交感神经盐水或腰部交感神经的利多卡因和静脉注射生理盐水。在这两种利多卡因/盐水剂量前后,以及在腰部交感神经阻滞和静脉输注之间,评估了自发和诱发的疼痛等级和感觉阈值。结果:招募了23例10-18岁的患者。有证据表明,刷牙(平均-1.4,95%置信区间[CI] -2.5至-0.3)和针刺时间总和(平均-1.3,95%CI -2.5至-0.2)降低了异常性疼痛的平均疼痛强度。与经静脉途径相比,通过腰部交感神经阻滞进行利多卡因治疗。与对刷,针刺和针刺的时间总和和口头疼痛评分的异常性疼痛的治疗前值相比,腰部交感神经阻滞也使疼痛强度明显降低。与治疗前的值相比,静脉注射利多卡因在自发和诱发的疼痛强度测量中并未产生明显变化。通过逐周期交互评估,没有残留影响。结论:在这项研究的条件下,结果提供了一些直接的证据,表明疼痛的一种成分可能是由异常的交感性传出活动介导的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号