首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesiology >Can we get there if we don't know where we're going?
【24h】

Can we get there if we don't know where we're going?

机译:如果我们不知道要去哪里,我们可以到达那里吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

JERRY Reves' 2006 Rovenstine lecture, which is published in this issue of Anesthesioi.ogy, accurately describes the diminutive research portfolio of American academic anesthesiology departments; among medical specialties, only family medicine garners fewer National Institutes of Health grant dollars per faculty member. His lecture identifies the "root causes" for low research productivity, including failure to attract research-oriented trainees, low research expectations of residents and faculty, inadequate research mentorship, and antiresearch financial incentives. Reves' plan to improve anesthesiology research calls for (1) scholarships to recruit M.D., Ph.D. students to anesthesiology residencies; (2) increased research time during anesthesiology residency; (3) incorporation of a mandatory research year into all subspe-cialty fellowship programs; (4) changes in academic compensation plans to reward research; and (5) abolition of the Medicare teaching rule for anesthesiology. This lecture is a cogentprecis of many of the "systems problems" that obstruct research training in anesthesiology and should be required reading for every anesthesiologist.
机译:本期Anesthesioi.ogy中发布的JERRY Reves的2006年Rovenstine讲座准确地描述了美国学术麻醉学部门的小型研究组合;在医学专业中,只有家庭医学获得的美国国立卫生研究院(National Institutes of Health)的每位教职员工补助金更少。他的演讲确定了导致研究效率低下的“根本原因”,包括未能吸引以研究为导向的学员,居民和教职员工的研究期望低,研究指导不足和反研究经费激励。 Reves改善麻醉学研究的计划要求(1)奖学金以招募医学博士,医学博士。学生到麻醉科住院; (2)延长了麻醉科住院期间的研究时间; (3)将强制性研究年纳入所有专科奖学金计划; (4)改变学术补偿计划以奖励研究; (5)取消《 Medicare麻醉学教学规则》。本讲座是阻碍麻醉学研究训练的许多“系统问题”的有说服力的说明,每位麻醉学家都应阅读该书。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号