...
首页> 外文期刊>Andrology >Erectile function recovery in patients after non-nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.
【24h】

Erectile function recovery in patients after non-nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.

机译:非神经保留性前列腺癌根治术后患者的勃起功能恢复。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Few studies have looked at erectile function recovery (EFR) rates in men undergoing non-nerve sparing resection during radical prostatectomy (RP). Existing studies show great variation in EFR rates owing to multiple factors that minimize their utility in counselling RP patients. We investigated the EFR rate and its predictors in unilateral cavernous nerve resection and bilateral cavernous nerve resection patients 24?months after RP. We conducted a population-based, prospective cohort study of 966 patients who underwent RP at a tertiary cancer centre from 2008 to 2012. Cavernous nerve condition was evaluated on a 4-point nerve sparing score and assigned to one of three groups: bilateral sparing, unilateral resection (UNR) and bilateral nerve resection (BNR). EF was assessed pre-RP and 24-30?months post-op using a validated 5-point patient-reported scale (1?=?fully rigid; 5?=?no tumescence). EFR was defined as a post-op EF grade of 1-2. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, anova, chi-square, Fisher's exact test and logistic regression. Mean baseline EF was 1.84?±?1.3 and 2.74?±?1.5 for UNR and BNR patients respectively. Thirty-three percent of UNR patients and 13% of BNR patients exhibited EFR. Age, baseline EF were predictors of EFR. Multivariable analysis showed baseline EF was a significant predictor of EFR at 24?months for UNR. For BNR patients, pre-RP EF was the only factor predictive of EFR. Patients undergoing nerve resection still have a significant chance of achieving true EFR, with UNR surgery patients showing more potential for improvement than patients undergoing BNR surgery. Age and baseline EFR characterize recovery prospects in these two groups. Physicians should thus measure and account for baseline EF in addition to age and the degree of nerve resection when advising patients about expectations for successful EF following RP.
机译:很少有研究关注前列腺癌根治术(RP)期间接受非神经保留切除的男性的勃起功能恢复(EFR)率。现有研究表明,由于多种因素导致EFR发生率差异很大,这些因素最大程度地降低了他们在RP患者咨询中的效用。我们调查了RP后24个月单侧海绵状神经切除和双侧海绵状神经切除患者的EFR率及其预测因子。我们进行了一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究,研究对象是2008年至2012年在三级癌症中心接受过RP的966例患者。根据4分神经保留评分对海绵状神经病进行了评估,并将其分为以下三组之一:单侧切除(UNR)和双侧神经切除(BNR)。 EF是在RP前和手术后24-30个月使用经过验证的5分患者报告量表(1?=“完全僵硬; 5?=•无肿胀”)评估的。 EFR被定义为术后EF等级1-2。统计分析包括描述性统计,方差分析,卡方,费舍尔精确检验和逻辑回归。 UNR和BNR患者的平均基线EF分别为1.84±1.3和2.74±1.5。 33%的UNR患者和13%的BNR患者表现出EFR。年龄,基线EF是EFR的预测指标。多变量分析显示,基线EF是UNR在24个月时的EFR的重要预测指标。对于BNR患者,RP前EF是预测EFR的唯一因素。进行神经切除术的患者仍有很大的机会获得真正的EFR,与进行BNR手术的患者相比,UNR外科手术的患者显示出更大的改善潜力。年龄和基线EFR表征了这两组的恢复前景。因此,当向患者建议进行RP后成功EF的期望值时,医师应该测量和考虑基线EF以及年龄和神经切除程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号