首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and Analgesia: Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society >A prospective observational study evaluating the ability of prelabor psychological tests to predict labor pain, epidural analgesic consumption, and maternal satisfaction
【24h】

A prospective observational study evaluating the ability of prelabor psychological tests to predict labor pain, epidural analgesic consumption, and maternal satisfaction

机译:一项前瞻性观察性研究,评估临产前心理测验预测分娩痛,硬膜外镇痛药消耗和产妇满意度的能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:: Psychological characteristics may affect interpretation and expression of pain. In this study, we sought to determine whether validated psychological tests predict the labor pain experience. METHODS:: Thirty-nine women with singleton term or post-term pregnancies undergoing induction of labor and successful vaginal delivery comprised the study population for this prospective observational study. Four validated psychological questionnaires (Anxiety Sensitivity Index [ASI], Fear of Pain [FPQIII], Pain Catastrophizing Scale [PCS]), and Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Short Scale) and 3-scaled ratings of anxiety, confidence, and analgesic expectations were completed before onset of labor. Outcome measures included time to epidural analgesia request, pain at request for epidural analgesia, area under the pain × time curve (AUC), epidural local anesthetic use per hour, and maternal satisfaction with analgesia. The relationship between psychological predictors and clinical responses was assessed using bivariate correlations and regression modeling. RESULTS:: Labor pain AUC (R = 0.45, P = 0.006), epidural local anesthetic use (R = 0.45, P = 0.019), and time to epidural analgesia request (R = 0.36, P = 0.015) were predicted with models incorporating some of the prelabor predictors. ASI, PCS, personality traits (lying, extroversion, psychoticism), and scaled ratings of anxiety, confidence, and analgesic expectations all contributed to the regression models of the outcomes. After proper model selection, neither FPQIII nor PCS was in the final multivariate linear regression model for labor pain AUC, although ASI was still included (P = 0.022). There was no significant correlation between ASI and self-reported anxiety (r = 0.03, P = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS:: Personality traits (psychoticism, extroversion, and lying), as well as scaled ratings of anxiety, confidence, and analgesia expectations, show some potential to predict labor pain, epidural local anesthetic use, and time to epidural analgesia request. Although ASI was included in the final model for labor pain AUC, and FPQ and PCS were not, further study is required to determine whether ASI is a better predictor than FPQ or PCS.
机译:背景:心理特征可能会影响疼痛的解释和表达。在这项研究中,我们试图确定经过验证的心理测验是否可以预测分娩痛的经历。方法:三十九例单胎足月或足月妊娠的引产和成功阴道分娩的妇女组成了该前瞻性观察研究的研究人群。完成了四份经过验证的心理问卷(焦虑敏感性指数[ASI],对疼痛的恐惧[FPQIII],对疼痛的影响的量表[PCS]和艾森克人格问卷-短期量表)以及对焦虑,自信心和镇痛预期的3级评估分娩前。结果指标包括硬膜外镇痛的时间,硬膜外镇痛的疼痛,疼痛×时间曲线下的面积(AUC),每小时硬膜外局部麻醉的使用以及母体对镇痛的满意度。使用双变量相关性和回归模型评估心理预测因素与临床反应之间的关系。结果:使用以下模型预测了分娩痛的AUC(R = 0.45,P = 0.006),硬膜外局部麻醉剂的使用(R = 0.45,P = 0.019)和硬膜外镇痛的时间(R = 0.36,P = 0.015)。一些预劳动力预测因素。 ASI,PCS,人格特质(说谎,性格外向,精神病)以及对焦虑,自信心和镇痛预期的等级评定均有助于结果的回归模型。经过适当的模型选择,尽管仍包括ASI,但最终的多元多元线性回归模型均未将FPQIII和PCS纳入最终多元线性回归模型(P = 0.022)。 ASI与自我报告的焦虑之间无显着相关性(r = 0.03,P = 0.91)。结论:人格特质(精神病,性格外向和说谎),以及对焦虑,自信心和镇痛期望值的分级评定,显示出预测分娩疼痛,硬膜外局部麻醉药的使用以及硬膜外镇痛所需时间的潜力。尽管ASI已包括在分娩疼痛AUC的最终模型中,而FPQ和PCS没有,但仍需要进一步研究以确定ASI是否比FPQ或PCS更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号