...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer: A Journal of the American Cancer Society >NCCTG N0879 (Alliance): A randomized phase 2 cooperative group trial of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab?±?everolimus for metastatic melanoma
【24h】

NCCTG N0879 (Alliance): A randomized phase 2 cooperative group trial of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab?±?everolimus for metastatic melanoma

机译:NCCTG N0879(联盟):Carboplatin,紫杉醇和Bevacizumab的随机阶段2合作组试验?±everolimus用于转移性黑色素瘤

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND Despite the success of immune checkpoint and targeted therapy, many patients with melanoma ultimately require further treatment. The combination of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab (CPB) has demonstrated promising activity in a single‐arm study. In the current study, the authors performed a randomized phase 2 study to confirm efficacy and to determine whether adding everolimus would increase the activity of the combination. METHODS Through the North Central Cancer Treatment Group, a total of 149 patients with unresectable AJCC 6th edition stage IV melanoma were randomized from May 2010 to May 2014 to either CPB or CPB with everolimus (CPBE). The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints of overall survival (OS), response rate, and tolerability. RESULTS The CPB and CPBE treatment arms were balanced with regard to age (median age: 59 years vs 58 years) and high lactate dehydrogenase (48% vs 51%), but were unbalanced with regard to sex (male sex: 72% vs 55%; P ?=?.03). Overall, there was no difference noted with regard to PFS, with a median PFS of 5.6 months for CPB versus 5.1 months for CPBE (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.81‐1.62 [ P ?=?.44]), or for OS, with a median OS of 14.5 months for CPB versus 10.8 months for CPBE (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.84‐1.84). The confirmed response rate was 13% for CPB and 23% for CPBE ( P ?=?.13). Toxicity was higher for CPBE compared with CPB (83% for grade 3?+?and 14% for grade 4?+?vs 63% for grade 3?+?and 11% for grade 4+, respectively) (toxicities were graded using the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program of the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.0]). Common grade 3?+?toxicities were neutropenia, leukopenia, and fatigue, which occurred in both treatment arms with comparable frequency. CONCLUSIONS Both experimental arms demonstrated activity, with a PFS of 5 months. However, the addition of everolimus to CPB failed to improve outcomes, with increased toxicity noted. These findings replicate the moderate antitumor activity of CPB, with future development possibly in combination with targeted or immunotherapy. Cancer 2018;124:537‐45. ? 2017 American Cancer Society .
机译:背景,尽管免疫检查点和靶向治疗成功,但许多黑色素瘤的患者最终需要进一步治疗。 Carboplatin,紫杉醇和贝伐单抗(CPB)的组合在单臂研究中表明了有希望的活性。在目前的研究中,作者进行了随机阶段2研究以确认疗效,并确定添加威洛米斯是否会增加组合的活动。方法通过北中央癌症治疗组,共149例不可切除的AJCC第6版阶段IV黑色素瘤从2010年5月至2014年5月随机分为威洛米司(CPBE)。主要终点是无进展的存活率(PFS),具有总存活(OS),响应率和耐受性的次要终点。结果CPB和CPBE治疗武器在年龄(中位数:59岁vs 58岁)和高乳酸脱氢酶(48%Vs 51%)方面是平衡的,但对性别(男性性别:72%VS 55)不平衡%; p?= 03)。总体而言,对PFS没有差异,CPB与5.1个月的中位数为5.6个月的PFS(危险比[HR],1.14; 95%置信区间[95%CI],0.81-1.62 [P. ?=β.44])或OS,中位数OS为14.5个月的CPB对CPBE的10.8个月(HR,1.16; 95%CI,0.84-1.84)。 CPB的确认响应率为CPB和23%的CPBE(P?= 33)。与CPB相比,CPB的毒性更高(3级3 + + + + + 14%,3级+ + + + + + + + + +〜+ + + + + +〜11%)(毒性分析)(使用毒性国家癌症研究所的癌症治疗评估计划常见术语对不良事件的术语标准[4.0])。常见的3级?+?毒性是中性粒细胞病,白细胞减少和疲劳,其两种治疗臂都有相当的频率。结论两个实验臂都证明了活性,具有PFS& 5个月。然而,增加everolimus到CPB未能提高毒性增加。这些发现复制了CPB的中度抗肿瘤活动,未来的发展可能与靶向或免疫疗法组合。癌症2018; 124:537-45。还2017年美国癌症协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号