...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer: A Journal of the American Cancer Society >Centralized patient‐reported outcome data collection in transplantation is feasible and clinically meaningful
【24h】

Centralized patient‐reported outcome data collection in transplantation is feasible and clinically meaningful

机译:移植中的集中患者报告的结果数据收集是可行的,临床上有意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) cures many patients, but often with the risk of late effects and impaired quality of life. The value of quantifying patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) is increasingly being recognized, but the routine collection of PROs is uncommon. This study evaluated the feasibility of prospective PRO collection by an outcome registry at multiple time points from unselected HCT patients undergoing transplantation at centers contributing clinical data to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), and then it correlated the PRO data with clinical and demographic data. METHODS The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT‐BMT), 36‐Item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36), and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory measures were administered before HCT, on day 100, and at 6 and 12 months. Patients were recruited by the transplant center, but posttransplant PRO collection was managed centrally by the CIBMTR. RESULTS There were 580 eligible patients, and 390 (67%) enrolled. Feasibility was shown by high time‐specific retention rates (176 of 238 at 1 year or 74%) and participant satisfaction. Factors associated with higher response rates were an age??50 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03‐2.41; P ?=?.0355), white race (OR, 4.61; 95% CI, 2.66‐7.99; P ??.0001), and being married (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.42‐3.65; P ?=?.0006) for adults and a higher family income for children (OR, 4.99; 95% CI, 2.12‐11.75; P ?=?.0002). Importantly, pre‐HCT PRO scores independently predicted survival after adjustments for patient‐, disease‐, and transplant‐related factors. The adjusted probabilities of 1‐year survival were 56%, 67%, 75%, and 76% by increasing quartiles of the pre‐HCT FACT‐BMT score and 58%, 72%, 62%, and 82% by increasing quartiles of the pre‐HCT SF‐36 physical component score. CONCLUSIONS A hybrid model of local consent for centralized PRO collection is feasible, and pretransplant PROs provide critical prognostic information for HCT outcomes. Cancer 2017;123:4687‐4700 . ? 2017 American Cancer Society .
机译:背景,同种异体造血细胞移植(HCT)治愈了许多患者,但通常具有晚期效应和生活质量受损的风险。量化患者报告的结果(专业人士)的价值越来越受到认可,但程序的常规收集罕见。本研究评估了未选择的HCT患者在接受临床数据到国际血液和骨髓移植研究中心的未选择的HCT患者的多个时间点对未选择的HCT患者的多个时间点的可行性临床和人口统计数据。方法在HCT,第100天和6天和6日之前给药癌症治疗 - 骨髓移植(SUFE-BMT),36项短型健康调查(SF-36)和儿科质量库存措施的功能评估。 12个月。患者是由移植中心招募的,但后普拉斯特普罗斯特队的CIBMTR集中管理。结果580名符合条件的患者,390名(67%)注册。可行性由高时间特异性保留率(176名为1年或1年或74%)和参与者的满意度。与较高响应率相关的因素是年龄?&?50年(赔率比[或],1.58; 95%的置信区间[CI],1.03-2.41; p?= _. 0355),白种族(或4.61 ; 95%CI,2.66-7.99; p?& 0001),已婚(或2.28; 95%CI,1.42-3.65; p?= _ 0006),以及儿童的较高家庭收入(或4.99; 95%CI,2.12-11.75; p?= 0002)。重要的是,在治疗患者,疾病和移植相关因素的调整后,HCT Pro Pro分数独立预测存活。通过增加血液前综述-BMT评分的四分位数和58%,72%,62%和82%,通过增加四分位数,1年存活的调整后的存活率为56%,67%,75%和76%,通过增加四分位数预计PCT SF-36物理分量分数。结论集中式专业集合本地同意的混合模型是可行的,而预防植物专业人员则为HCT结果提供关键的预后信息。癌症2017; 123:4687-4700。还2017年美国癌症协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号