...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer: A Journal of the American Cancer Society >Monocentric Study of Bile Aspiration Associated With Biliary Brushing Performed During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in 239 Patients With Symptomatic Biliary Stricture
【24h】

Monocentric Study of Bile Aspiration Associated With Biliary Brushing Performed During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in 239 Patients With Symptomatic Biliary Stricture

机译:在症状胆道狭窄239例患者内窥镜逆行胆管痴呆症期间表演胆汁吸附与胆汁刷牙相关的单眼性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The cytologic diagnosis obtained by brushing or biopsy in malignant biliary strictures is considered to be highly specific but poorly sensitive. The diagnostic association of biliary brushing and bile exfoliate cytology has been suggested but is rarely performed in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of bile aspiration associated with biliary brushing during therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHODS: From 2004 to 2009, 239 consecutive patients who underwent ERCP were included in the study. The biliary strictures were considered clinically benign in 26% of patients, uncertain in 25%, and malignant in 49%. The 298 cytologic samples collected were divided in 3 groups: bile aspiration alone (26%), biliary brushing alone (20%), and bile aspiration combined with brushing (54%). The definitive diagnosis of malignancy was obtained by biopsy, surgery, and fine-needle aspiration or was determined by an unfavorable disease course. RESULTS: The cytologic diagnoses were as follows: 149 samples were benign (50%), 114 were malignant (38%), 34 had atypia (12%), and 1 had no diagnostic value. The procedure output values were as follows: for bile aspiration alone, sensitivity was 56.4%, specificity was 93.9%, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 91.7%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 64.6%; for brushing alone, sensitivity was 62.5%, both specificity and the PPV were 100%, and the NPV was 73%; and, for bile aspiration and brushing combined, sensitivity was 81%, both specificity and the PPV were 100%, and the NPV was 75%. CONCLUSIONS: For patients who have symptomatic biliary stricture, bile aspiration during ERCP is a simple and safe procedure. Bile aspiration combined with brushing significantly increases the yield of cytology for malignant biliary tumors (sensitivity, 81%), particularly in cholangiocarcinomas. (C) 2015 American Cancer Society.
机译:背景:通过刷涂或活组织检查在恶性胆道狭窄中获得的细胞学诊断被认为是高度特异性但敏感的敏感性。已经提出了胆道刷涂和胆汁去角质细胞学的诊断协会,但很少在临床实践中进行。本研究的目的是评估与治疗内窥镜逆行胆管痴呆(ERCP)期间与胆汁刷牙相关的胆汁抽吸诊断性能。方法:从2004年到2009年,239名接受ERCP的连续患者被纳入该研究。胆道狭窄在26%的患者中被认为是临床良性的,25%不确定,并恶化为49%。收集的298个细胞学样品分为3组:单独的胆汁抽吸(26%),单独胆汁刷涂(20%),胆汁抽吸合并刷涂(54%)。通过活组织检查,手术和细针抽吸获得的恶性肿瘤的最终诊断或通过不利的疾病课程确定。结果:细胞学诊断如下:149个样品是良性(50%),114例恶性(38%),34例含有缺点(12%),1例1没有诊断价值。该程序输出值如下:对于单独的胆汁抽吸,敏感性为56.4%,特异性为93.9%,阳性预测值(PPV)为91.7%,负预测值(NPV)为64.6%;对于单独刷涂,敏感性为62.5%,特异性和PPV为100%,NPV为73%;而且,对于胆汁抽吸和刷涂合并,敏感性为81%,特异性和PPV均为100%,NPV为75%。结论:对于具有症状性胆道狭窄的患者,ERCP期间的胆汁吸入是一种简单而安全的程序。胆汁抽吸结合刷涂显着增加了恶性胆汁肿瘤的细胞学产量(敏感性,81%),特别是在胆管癌中。 (c)2015年美国癌症协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号