...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Infection Control >Control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in planktonic form and biofilms: a biocidal efficacy study of nonthermal dielectric-barrier discharge plasma.
【24h】

Control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in planktonic form and biofilms: a biocidal efficacy study of nonthermal dielectric-barrier discharge plasma.

机译:控制耐甲氧西林的金黄色葡萄球菌的浮游生物形式和生物膜:非热介电屏障放电等离子体的杀生物功效研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Bacterial contamination of surfaces with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a serious problem in the hospital environment and is responsible for significant nosocomial infections. The pathogenic contaminants form biofilms, which are difficult to treat with routine biocides. Thus, a continuous search for novel disinfection methods is essential for effective infection control measures. This demonstration of a novel technique for the control of virulent pathogens in planktonic form as well as in established biofilms may provide a progressive alternative to standard methodology. METHODS: We evaluated a novel technique of normal atmospheric nonthermal plasma known as floating-electrode dielectric-barrier discharge (FE-DBD) plasma against a control of planktonic and biofilm forms of Escherichia coli, S aureus, multidrug-resistant methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) -95 (clinical isolate), -USA300, and -USA400, using widely accepted techniques such as colony count assay, LIVE/DEAD BacLight Bacterial Viability assay, and XTT (2,3-Bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide) assay. RESULTS: Exposure of free living planktonic forms of E coli, S aureus, and MRSA were rapidly inactivated by DBD plasma. Approximately 10(7) bacterial cells were completely (100%) killed, whereas 10(8) and 10(9) were reduced by approximately 90% to 95% and 40% to 45%, respectively, in less than 60 seconds (7.8 J/cm(2)) and completely disinfected in < or =120 seconds. In established biofilms, the susceptibility of MRSA USA400 was comparable with USA300 but less susceptible than MRSA95 (clinical isolate), S aureus, and E coli (P < .05) to FE-DBD plasma, and plasma was able to kill MRSA more than 60% within 15 seconds (1.95 J/cm(2)). The killing responses were plasma exposure-time dependent, and cell density dependent. The plasma was able disinfect surfaces in a less than 120 seconds. CONCLUSION: Application of DBD plasma can be a valuable decontamination technique for the removal of planktonic and biofilm-embedded bacteria such as MRSA -USA 300, -USA 400, methicillin-sensitive S aureus (MSSA), and E coli, the more common hospital contaminants. Of interest, E coli was more resistant than S aureus phenotypes.
机译:背景:耐甲氧西林的金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)污染细菌表面是医院环境中的一个严重问题,是造成重大医院感染的原因。致病性污染物形成生物膜,这些生物膜很难用常规杀生物剂处理。因此,不断寻找新的消毒方法对于有效的感染控制措施至关重要。这种控制浮游形式以及已建立的生物膜中的致病性病原体的新技术的论证可能为标准方法提供了一种渐进的替代方法。方法:我们评估了一种新型的正常大气非热等离子体技术,称为浮动电极介电屏障放电(FE-DBD)等离子体,该技术可控制大肠杆菌,金黄色葡萄球菌,耐多药性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的浮游生物膜和生物膜形式(MRSA)-95(临床分离株),-USA300和-USA400,使用了广泛接受的技术,例如菌落计数测定,LIVE / DEAD BacLight细菌生存力测定和XTT(2,3-Bis(2-methoxy-4-硝基5-磺基苯基)-2H-四唑鎓5-甲酰苯胺)分析。结果:DBD血浆可快速灭活大肠杆菌,金黄色葡萄球菌和MRSA等自由活动的浮游生物。在不到60秒的时间内,大约10(7)个细菌细胞被完全(100%)杀死,而10(8)和10(9)分别减少了90%至95%和40%至45%。 J / cm(2)),并在<或= 120秒内完全消毒。在已建立的生物膜中,MRSA USA400的敏感性与USA300相当,但对FE-DBD血浆的敏感性不如MRSA95(临床分离株),金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌(P <.05),并且血浆能够杀死MRSA的能力大于15秒内达到60%(1.95 J / cm(2))。杀伤反应与血浆暴露时间有关,与细胞密度有关。等离子体能够在不到120秒的时间内消毒表面。结论:DBD血浆的应用可能是一种有价值的去污技术,用于去除浮游生物和生物膜包埋的细菌,例如MRSA -USA 300,-USA 400,对甲氧西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)和大肠杆菌(较常见的医院)污染物。有趣的是,大肠杆菌比金黄色葡萄球菌表型更具抗性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号