首页> 外文期刊>Aggressive behavior: A multidisciplinary journal devoted to the experimental and observational analysis of conflict in humans and animals >Confirmatory factor analysis and the factor structure of expagg in context: A reply to forrest et al., 2002
【24h】

Confirmatory factor analysis and the factor structure of expagg in context: A reply to forrest et al., 2002

机译:验证性因素分析和背景下expagg的因素结构:Forrest等人的回复(2002年)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

It has been suggested that confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) can be used to investigate the construct validity of psychometric scales and Forrest et al. [2000] specifically query the factor structure of Expagg using this technique. In this paper we report unsuccessful attempts to confirm the factor structure of three widely used scales using CFA criteria. In the fourth study, a two-factor model of Expagg, which has been derived from previous studies, is tested for fit on new data. The results suggest that from a CFA point of view, Expagg is best considered as two scales measuring expressivity and instrumentality with five items on each scale. This model satisfies four of the five fit criteria (CFI = 90, GFI = .94, RMSEA = .08, ECVI = .44), failing only on the chi square test, a benchmark that has attracted criticism from statisticians. Other concerns are raised about the meaning of CFA results and their importance.
机译:有人提出,验证性因素分析(CFA)可用于研究心理测验量表的结构效度,Forrest等人。 [2000]使用这种技术专门查询Expagg的因子结构。在本文中,我们报告了使用CFA标准来确认三种广泛使用的量表的因子结构的尝试失败。在第四项研究中,测试了Expagg的两因素模型,该模型是从先前的研究中得出的,适用于新数据。结果表明,从CFA的角度来看,Expagg最好被认为是衡量表达性和工具性的两个量表,每个量表上有五个项目。该模型满足五个拟合标准中的四个(CFI = 90,GFI = .94,RMSEA = .08,ECVI = .44),仅在卡方检验上未通过,该基准受到了统计学家的批评。关于CFA结果的含义及其重要性也引起了其他关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号